Replies

1 posted on 05/24/2004 7:55:39 PM PDT by billorites

This story will soon die unless it's discovered that the wedding was a gay wedding.

2 posted on 05/24/2004 8:10:02 PM PDT by bayourod (Gay weddings will provoke Muslim terrorist attacks on America, but the press will blame Bush)

There are NO reports that women and children were killed. The verified dead count was 40 men all of able-bodied age. The wedding video did show women, but they were absent in the dead count, and all subsequent analysis of the ruins.

How did a video that was filmed right before the attack...as it is claimed, manage to walk away from our troops who were collecting evidence for analysis?

The fundamental claims have not been answered.

What kind of wedding party has no women or children present?

What kind of wedding party is held in the middle of the desert, miles away from social centers and religious shrines?

What kind of Iraqi wedding is held on a Wednesday night? (Iraqi weddings are typically held on tuesdays or thursdays, for reasons that I do not understand).

Why did the party have equipment designed for making fake passports and false legal documents?

Why was this "party" in the middle of a trail that our EWACS have identified as a "Rat Tail"?

OK, I can understand the use of having an AK-47 around...even an AK-72. But not fully automatic Medium machine guns. What were they doing there?

Why were there scrambling communications equipment and satellite communication is a "innocent brides hut"?

Why did the wedding party have lookout scouts ringed around the perimeter of the compound?

If it was a wedding party, then where are the musical instruments, the food, the wedding dresses, and other items that signify a celebration? They are all absent.

In fact the only proof that we have that this was a Wedding party is the mysterious video. Funny that it showed up days after there were doubts on the authenticity of the Arab Newsmedia reporting.

3 posted on 05/24/2004 8:14:02 PM PDT by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)

5 posted on 05/25/2004 12:20:52 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)

To: Antoninus; lainde; RightWingMama; sartorius; DAVEY CROCKETT; Cannoneer No. 4; Dog; Cap Huff; ...

6 posted on 05/25/2004 12:35:00 AM PDT by Eurotwit

Could you help me with a summary of Wretchard's conclusion here? I couldn't figure it out.

7 posted on 05/25/2004 12:42:21 AM PDT by Barlowmaker

I always figured the wedding party stuff was somewhat truthful. Even if just 50% of the entire truth.

13 posted on 05/25/2004 5:04:52 AM PDT by dennisw ("Allah FUBAR!")

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794