Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conflicting “Wedding” Reports
Stambord ^ | 5/24/04 | Michael Moynihan

Posted on 05/24/2004 3:05:51 PM PDT by swilhelm73

Yesterday’s Guardian headline was unequivocal: the Americans were behind a “Wedding Party Massacre.” No scare-quotes. No qualifiers. There was a wedding and there was a massacre. It’s not unlikely, of course. The Unites States military has made grave errors in the past (recall the wedding party in Afghanistan, the pharmaceutical plant in Sudan and the Chinese embassy in Belgrade).

But I am skeptical of this “massacre” for a variety of reasons, not least the conflicting eye-witness accounts.

One “massacre” survivor told the Washington Post that “the wedding party was in full swing – with dinner just finished and the band playing tribal Arab music – when US fighter jets roared overhead and US vehicles started shining their highbeams. Worried, the hosts ended the party men stayed in the wedding tent, and women and children went inside the house nearby, the witnesses said. About five hours later, the first shell hit the tent.”

But other ‘witnesses’ forgot their lines, saying that “revelers had fired volleys of gunfire into the air in a traditional wedding celebration before the attack.” The response—like in Afghanistan—was just a big misunderstanding.

So were they hiding in the house for five hours or did the American military–who just happened to be in the area—nervously overreact to a raucous party?

UPDATE: Skepticism over the “wedding massacre” in the New York Times. In the Times account, notice that the slain “wedding singer” has, in death, decided upon a name change.

“Among the dead was Hussein Ali, a popular wedding singer.” - Washington Post (5/20)

“Among the dead, by several accounts, was Nazar al-Khalid, a well-known Iraqi wedding singer who often traveled to Syria.” - New York Times


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; weddingattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 05/24/2004 3:05:51 PM PDT by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
The Unites States military has made grave errors in the past (recall the wedding party in Afghanistan, the pharmaceutical plant in Sudan and the Chinese embassy in Belgrade).

I don't believe the wedding in Afghanistan was innocent either. As for the pharmaceutical plant, the press defended that for years, because clinton was the perpetrator. That wasn't a military mistake, it was the commander in chief's direct orders, to take the heat off Monica.

Same with the Chinese embassy. There was plenty of evidence that it was bombed on purpose, although for what reason I really don't know.

2 posted on 05/24/2004 3:31:12 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
The Unites States military has made grave errors in the past...(recall the Chinese embassy in Belgrade).

Where's the "grave error?" I thought they hit the damned thing dead center!

3 posted on 05/24/2004 3:33:18 PM PDT by lancer (If you are not with us, you are against us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

Anybody familiar with the Afghan 'wedding' incident, could easily manufacture same. If the bad guys are willing to store arsenals in and conduct operations sacred places, they are perfectly capable of scheduling a meeting during a wedding.


4 posted on 05/24/2004 3:35:29 PM PDT by Jumpmaster (Teddy is all wet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

Where were the bride and groom registered for thir RPGs and SATCOM radios?

I can see Adam Sandler playing the wedding singer in the movie version of this!


5 posted on 05/24/2004 3:41:45 PM PDT by Wacka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

There is nothing to support the notion that this was a "wedding". The circumstantial evidence pointing toward this being a terrorist "safe" house, OTOH, is pretty substantial.

But the anti-Bush press isn't get to let this story go - unlike what they did with the Nick Berg story.


6 posted on 05/24/2004 4:21:36 PM PDT by DustyMoment (Repeal CFR NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wacka
Where were the bride and groom registered for thir RPGs and SATCOM radios?

Just a guess, Prometheus Radio and Tower, the Nick Berg company?

-PJ

7 posted on 05/24/2004 6:19:12 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

Not too smart for a "wedding party" to go outside and fire a lot of weapons in the air near a patroling U.S. helicopter at zero dark thirty.


8 posted on 05/24/2004 6:22:40 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Roger that...

Say... on another topic... I think I saw you on another thread saying that you were a coastie on an icebreaker. That wouldn't have been the Polar Sea would it? About the 85-86 vintage or so?

I was an SA/SN on there at that time, and I could swear I remember a CWO Jackson. Might just be creative memory. Dunno. I was there for (at least) Arctic West Summer 86.

I went on from there to QM "A" School. Was on Resolute (Astoria) after that, through '89. Was a QM2 there when I left.

Just wonderin'...


9 posted on 05/24/2004 6:34:23 PM PDT by Ramius (Fix! Bayonets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Yep, but I wasn't on either of the Polars then...for which I am most likely thankful. Once they got some of the teething problems worked out of them with the screws they aren't bad breakers.

Now the new Alex Haley...you couldn't pay me enough to take a trip on her. She killed one while building, killed one when launched and she scares the heck out of me. It was built for maximum automation and minimum manning (entire crew is roughly 60). I would not want to be on her in the case of a fire or hull breach.

10 posted on 05/24/2004 6:41:35 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

And by the way QM...right way to go.


11 posted on 05/24/2004 6:42:01 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Roger that... The Polars were (are) an incredible machine that munch hard ice like candy. Nothing like steaming at regular speed through ten foot thick ice without even having to slow, back and ram. The Polar Star (Building 10, as we called it) was *always* either in the yards while we were out doing their job, or they were up stuck in the ice waiting for us to come pull them out. By the time they built my boat (WAGB 11) they had the propeller issues worked out, and we did a lot of underway time.

Roger that on going QM. Loved it. Still miss it. Some days (more than I'll admit) I really wish I'd stayed and made a career out of it.


12 posted on 05/24/2004 6:49:32 PM PDT by Ramius (Fix! Bayonets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
At 30 years, 7 months and 19 days I still hadn't made up my mind if I wanted to make a career out of it so I left.

The wife and I were just over to the stations at Neah Bay and La Push; they were paying honor to the Coastie who was just killed in Iraq. I don't know if you ever got near those stations but the folks on the reservations are awesome to us.

13 posted on 05/24/2004 6:53:06 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

...and... I haven't heard much else about the Haley.

Can't speak to the death rate. We lost one on the Polar Sea due to a freak wave in the Gulf of AK. 50 or 60 foot wave came broadside outta nowhere. Ship heeled over about 58deg, and a guy fell across the 80ft width of the bridge. He never had a chance. Bad things happen in the Gulf of AK.


14 posted on 05/24/2004 6:54:27 PM PDT by Ramius (Fix! Bayonets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
I remember the accident you were talking about.

As for the Healy, her first victim was one of the yardbirds building her. The second was an older lady at the launch. The Healy has a very flat sided hull; they side launched it into the Mississippi with reviewing seats almost right up to the ways. It wouldn't have taken a rocket scientist to know what was going to happen.

That large flat side hit the river, pushed it out and a six foot wave came roaring back over the spectators. A dead head in the water took out the old lady; she lived a couple of days. Many people injured and a lot who drank Mississippi River water.

As for the manning...imagine a ship almost the six of a Polar (no where near the ability) then give it a crew of 60.

15 posted on 05/24/2004 7:00:10 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
At 30 years, 7 months and 19 days I still hadn't made up my mind if I wanted to make a career out of it so I left.

Right indecisive of you, that... :-) hehehe..

The wife and I were just over to the stations at Neah Bay and La Push; they were paying honor to the Coastie who was just killed in Iraq. I don't know if you ever got near those stations but the folks on the reservations are awesome to us.

I've been to those stations. I live in Gig Harbor now. I don't get out to the coast all the time, but I do try to do so with some frequency. Sounds like a fine event for them, if somber. Those are good places. Yer' bringing up all manner of memories now. It's good to think back on it all. I sure do miss it.

If anything, it was a good deal more meaningful than the office job I've had for the fifteen or so years hence. Life has been good, but money ain't everything. In fact... it's damn little in the big scheme of things.

16 posted on 05/24/2004 7:06:44 PM PDT by Ramius (Fix! Bayonets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Early on I decided it wasn't a job, it was a way of life. I also got fortunate, a good mix of sea/shore duties and NEVER assigned to HQ or Governors Island.

They pay sucked until I made Chief and wasn't bad at all when I made warrant. Warrant is the best racket going in the Coast Guard, particularly deck, and CWO4...well, I wouldn't take three stars for it.

17 posted on 05/24/2004 7:11:07 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

18 posted on 05/24/2004 7:22:29 PM PDT by Sloth (We cannot defeat foreign enemies of the Constitution if we yield to the domestic ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

I hear you. Warrant is a damn fine way to do it. Congrats on making all the way to CWO4. Wow... nicely done, sir.

I enlisted with a simultaneous application to OCS, but that's a sad story how that didn't work out. I sure did enjoy my years as a QM though. I got to know some pretty damn salty sailors. Got to do things I'd never have had a chance to do any other way in my life. [snif]

OK... not fair... you're making me all reminiscent and stuff.

Are you still in the greater WA area? I'd sure like to invite you to a beer and some sea stories. I'll buy... :-)


19 posted on 05/24/2004 7:33:36 PM PDT by Ramius (Fix! Bayonets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
We live in Kent when we're in state; which the past year hasn't been often. I was actually called back for a while last year and once I got hydrated again I quite my job and we've been traveling.

Did you ever make a South Trip? I got close to being able to visit Machu Pichu three times and never made it for one reason or another. We're headed down there soon.

We will have to hook up sometime though...and good thing you didn't go OCS. The chances of integration for OCS was way too narrow. It improved in recent years but...you know how it works.

20 posted on 05/24/2004 7:37:06 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson