Posted on 05/24/2004 9:26:28 AM PDT by gcruse
bump for later reading.
Highly doubtful.
-- Joke-candidate Aaron Russo.
I like Medved's name for this party:
Losertarians.
Unlikely. Being a freeloader carping on the sidelines is what Libertarianism is all about.
The LP garnered less than 100,000 votes in 2000, and this clown thinks he can get 1 million people to part with $100? Sure.
this Libertarian serving in Iraq will be voting for Bush this time.
Thank you, on two counts.
I like Medved's name for this party:
Losertarians.
The Constitution Party is the only party which is completely pro-life, anti-homosexual rights, pro-American sovereignty, anti-globalist, anti-free trade, anti-deindustrialization, anti-unchecked immigration, pro-second amendment, and against the constantly increasing expansion of unlawful police laws, in favor of a strong national defense and opposed to unconstitutional interventionism.
Most everyone I know who voted for Bush in 2000 is disgusted with him.
However, one of the biggest reasons is his cuddling up to Fox and failing to notice the fact that we are under attack from Mexico.
The Libertarians advocate open borders.
How stupid is that?
I'm a Libertarian registered as a republican think both parties are loosers and am voting for Bush who I detest.. Why ?.. No other intelligent choice.
If you don't get into politics to win and change things, then you should get out of the way! Most people do not enter a race to come in dead last or close -- they enter to win.
Guess with your analogy, football should play for 2nd place and not worry about winning.
That's the problem with 3rd Party people and why they go nowhere -- they are willing to settle for a very, very small piece of the pie and the only affect they have is electing someone who is not close to their way of thinking by helping the opposition.
Shame you cannot see that standing on principle without support gets you nowhere. You change from within by electing conservatives at the local level and eventually we will make the change all the way up. By supporting 3rd Party people that only get in the race to earn money to live, you are supporting people who have no chance of making a change but like to hear themselves talk!
In this case, electing John Kerry is not standing on principle -- it is shortsighted and foolish.
Why don't you go read the platform for the Libs and come back and tell us how much you agree with?
Spoken with authority, and moral clarity....End of debate!
Vote for 3rd party = hanging chad = dead money
In...Wisconsin, the 2002 Libertarian gubernatorial candidate Ed Thompson garnered about 185,000 votes, a startling 10.5 percent.
Ed Thompson was and is an idiot. Exceeded only by the 185,000 voters who confused his name with Tommy Thompson, our beloved former governor who had stepped down to go to Washington and work for President Bush.
More divide and conquer the right garbage from the Bush-haters at CBS. Let's see how many here ask CBS how high they should jump?
No wonder CBS is dead last in the news department.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.