Posted on 05/23/2004 4:50:37 PM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
Today: May 23, 2004 at 13:01:37 PDT
Journalists Worried About News Quality, Not Plagarism By WILL LESTER ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) - Journalists are growing more concerned that bottom-line financial pressures are "seriously hurting" the quality of news coverage, according to a survey taken at a time when news organizations face increased competition for readers and viewers.
A majority of national and local journalists say they think financial pressures are hurting coverage, said the survey released Sunday by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press.
"Journalists are in a glummer mood than we've found them in the past," said Andrew Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center. "That view is much more prevalent where cutbacks have happened."
The number of national journalists who think bottom-line financial pressures are hurting coverage was 66 percent this year, compared with about 40 percent in a Pew survey from 1995.
Just under six in 10 local journalists were more worried about financial pressures hurting quality, compared with one-third in 1995.
More than half of the executives at national news organizations said increased business pressures are "just changing the way news organizations do things."
Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, said a news media study earlier this year found many news organizations have cut staff.
"We found that most sectors of the news media, other than online and ethnic media, are losing audience because there is so much more competition," Rosenstiel said.
About half of those whom Pew surveyed from newspapers and magazines said they have seen reductions in the size of their newsroom staff in the past three years.
Despite these concerns about cut, about seven in 10 news professionals say the management in their news operation is excellent or good.
National journalists were more likely than a decade ago to say there are too many factual errors in coverage, while local reporters were less inclined to say that was a problem.
A majority of journalists of all backgrounds and different type of operations said they do not think plagiarism is more widespread now, despite widely publicized cases in the past year.
The survey found a reduction in the number of journalists who think news reporters are too cynical and many now think they are too timid.
More than half of national journalists say the press has not been critical enough of President Bush. Local journalists were about evenly split between thinking the press is not critical enough or is fair in its treatment of the president.
Nearly eight in 10 in both the national and local news media say that not enough attention is paid to complex issues, similar to Pew's findings on this question in 1995 and 1999.
A majority of news professionals say the emergence of the Internet has made journalism better, especially because it has improved research methods.
The survey was taken from March 10 through April 20 of 547 national and local journalists, both print and broadcast. The sample was chosen from national directories of staffers, editors and executives at newspapers, magazines, wire services, national networks and local television stations from the 100 largest markets.
Get tougher on President Bush and go out of business faster.Rage on,Rush is right less people are listening.
They still don't get it.
Of course, they overlooked FOX News and the fact that it is the QUALITY of the competition, not the quantity, that is allowing the competition to eat their lunch now (and soon, their dinners too!).
They're going down for the last time. And they reach for the anchor.
If the owners of these papers and magazines would exercise a little judgement in their hiring practices and hire only those who would report the news without their political bias showing, they'd probably see business pick up.
Will they do that? No.
Perfect analogy...
What,a constant and steady stream of "Bush Bashing" is not enough for these guys?
You bet!
The use of "quantity" and ommiting mention of quality proves that they will lie even to themselves.
S'cuse me....I feel my gorge rising
Actually many leaders in the industry ignore the bottom line, they are so ideologically driven.
As a rule of thumb, most editors would rather print ideological drivel than make a profit, as long as their own salaries are not impaired. If someone else has to be fired because circulation is down, too bad.
More than half of national journalists are activists pretending to be "journalists."
While, in the past, the media (as a monopoly) might have suceeded in this effort, facing competition which offers the public high-quality objective content, they are fading fast into what GW might call "the dustbin of failed ideas".
These people totally do not get it, do they? People are getting booed off stage by college kids for bashing the president and the left's answer is to bash him more. This is going to backfire on them big time. I'm counting on it.
Yes they have cast their lot, and their ship is taking water. Enough that some, more evenhanded journalists, have been able to wiggle out from underneath liberal bias oppression and get into lifeboats so to speak. John Stossel and Brian Sussman come to mind.
Journalism self-defines as wisdom. Any individual journalist would of course deny that - but no individual journalist would deny the claim that "journalism" is objective, and objectivity is impossible without wisdom. Anyone who denies the objectivity of journalism would instantly be drummed out of the field of journalism by the full propaganda power of all other journalists.But the well-known characteristics of journalism are directly at odds with the cultivation of wisdom.
That means that journalism is superficial, negative, and unrepresentative - a witch's brew which is inimicable to the cultivation of wisdom. It is in fact the perfect concoction in which to produce "liberalism" - socialism, misleading labeled.
- Always meet your deadline
- If it bleeds it leads
- Man Bites Dog is news, "Dog Bites Man" is not news.
These "press" retards have been graduated from schools that forgot to teach them that the media business is a private enterprise concern. That means, simply, no profits, no business! The more liberal, left-wing, "traitor" Democrat Party BS they print, the more newspapers and TV mainstream media will go down the drain. Hello........has anyone noticed the ever declining viewers of CNN, CNBC, MSNBC, etc.? And....the declining readership of the New York Times? End of story!
Geez. It's bash Bush 24/7.
No wonder people are tuning out.
Breathtaking.
Nearly eight in 10 in both the national and local news media say that not enough attention is paid to complex issues,
What they mean is not enough people swallow their spin on these "complex issues".
Bah
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.