Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RichInOC

>That's simple. Job security. More torture subjects=more clients.

You are probably mistaken. Dersh saw the light on 9/11/2001. He's still a liberal, but he's for the War on Terror.


6 posted on 05/23/2004 11:42:38 AM PDT by Darnright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Darnright

Perhaps...but we'll see.


7 posted on 05/23/2004 11:46:08 AM PDT by RichInOC ("...he'd get a ruddy complexion, and he'd grow a few inches taller.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Darnright; RichInOC
>That's simple. Job security. More torture subjects=more clients. You are probably mistaken. Dersh saw the light on 9/11/2001. He's still a liberal, but he's for the War on Terror.

I wonder which of you is right. I, personally, trust liberals, socialists, and lawyers less than conservatives, hawks and libertarians.

One constant occurance with libRats is that they propose some policy "for the children" or some such lofty reason, and their real purpose is power and access to other people's money. That's why, when their policies fail to accomplish stated goals, they always need more power and more money to make it work, so we get more of the same instead of a change in POLICY.

I believe Dershowitz wants torture because he believes he can control it to his own advantage with lib help. Ethical and moral conservative judges probably would not issue ANY torture warrants, but activist liberal judges would, but only for conservative or rightist subjects. It would be a dream come true for the commies, to have a legal system operate like Hitler's or Stalin's. Think of all the confessions they'd get.

17 posted on 05/23/2004 12:19:18 PM PDT by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson