Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: looscnnn

No you apparently don't read well...The federal law applies to VIOLENT felons...so your brother's case is irrelevant. You must live in downtown Baghdad or some other nefarious place ( like Bali) to need body armor and a fire arm to protect yourself.You have no understanding of the Declaration or the Constitution...might be helpful if you read and studied about them


77 posted on 05/24/2004 7:50:39 PM PDT by jnarcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: jnarcus

"You must live in downtown Baghdad or some other nefarious place ( like Bali) to need body armor and a fire arm to protect yourself.You have no understanding of the Declaration or the Constitution...might be helpful if you read and studied about them"

Since when does either talk about need? Your comments only help the libs with their cause, "no one needs guns/body armor/SUVs", etc. I think you need to re-read/study them. As for applying to VIOLENT felons, it would be nothing to have them now move it to all felons, then to all criminals or even all citizens. After all, we don't "need" them.

I get the feeling that you also think that the AWB is fine and that citizens don't "need" them either. Let's just ban golf clubs, baseball bats, knives, cars, etc. After all, we don't really "need" them and so many have died because of them.


79 posted on 05/25/2004 6:00:44 AM PDT by looscnnn ("Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils" Gen. John Stark 1809)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson