[Cultural Jihad]

Supposedly by your 'logic' if someone gets their driver's license revoked then they must be incarcerated, too.

[tpaine]

TERMINATTOR posted:

"Several of the people charged were felons or were covered by domestic violence restraining orders and were prohibited from possessing firearms, Bogden said."

______________________________________


If those charged as felons are still considered dangerous, you have to wonder why they didn't keep them locked up.
25 FITZ

______________________________________


Supposedly by your 'logic' if someone gets their driver's license revoked then they must be incarcerated, too.
29 cj

______________________________________


Daft logic on your part cj, as losing a driving license still permits you to own and ride in, thus 'use' a vehicle.

In the case at hand, the state is claiming it can flat out prohibit ownership/possession of certain types of property, based on what 'might' happen if it is misused.

That claim clearly violates the rule of constitutional law. -- We have an inalienable right to life, liberty, and property.. See the 14th.

[FITZ]

I think if you are a dangerous felon, you shouldn't be out of prison in the first place. If you're a domestic abuser --- beating your wife half-to-death or threatening to kill your family --- then you should be locked up. If you are not a danger --- but you could be in fear for your own life --- why shouldn't you have the right to protect yourself? If you committed a serious crime --- but you aren't dangerous, you could have some pretty bad enemies who wish to kill you --- shouldn't you have the same right to self-protection that I, a more innocent person has?