Posted on 05/22/2004 3:28:44 PM PDT by Andy from Beaverton
Often men with light colored hair will have darker facial hair, too.
I feel bad for Nick Berg's his sister and mother. Speaking of his Mother.....is she alive? There has been no comment from her. Yes, it is absolutely apalling what Michael Berg said. Makes you wonder what their relationship was like. I find it hard to believe that he really loved his son. He defiled his own son's memory by politicising his slaughter as surely as the IslamoFacists defiled Nick Berg's body by decapitation.
I'm afraid that Mr. Berg didn't only drank the Kool-aid, he asked for seconds. It sounds like he hates George Bush more than he loved his son.
Actually many other acquaintances have confirmed what Berg's father said and in addition, so did a FReeper's friend(one in good standing with many posts to his name)
Nick lost his head.
Michael lost is mind.
If you have any links to any of theses supportive references, I'd appreciate it.
I honestly don't bookmark those links. A search of my posts on the Berg threads will, at the least, take you to those articles, I think. That should be a start ?
I had a link to some of his emails, but now no web sites are working for me? Let's hope this post gets through.(seems to be)
Oh, get real.
I read tons of Berg threads, and all I ever saw was his father saying that Nick was a Bush fan. I'll try to get my memory working. It's not that I reject it, it's just that Berg Sr is such a repellent serpent-like character every word coming from his mouth is suspect.
I'm not sure if it helps his agenda to say his son was a Bush supporter. I mean, if anything, for his far-left cronies it makes him "part of the problem" or a "war profiteer" like the evil Haliburton and such.
But there is a ring of faint truth to his words about his son. He clearly is idealizing his son in the wake of his death, his crime is in using the memory of his son to further his own agenda, even though his son was opposed to him on this point.
Those Chinese will sell to anyone. < / s >
Eggs..I agree why bother to give him the press/air time. Time to move on..more important battles to take on then a grieving and misguided father.
Such men, when purged by Stalin and marched to a wall to be shot, called out with their last breaths "Long live the revolution! Long live Marxism-Leninism!"
It's not so rare, actually.
Would you be so kind as to provide a link to that ruling? I'd not heard that...
Note also that, although most of their arguments for the right to shred babies are couched in relativist language ("Who are YOU to make that decision for other people?") they have absolute certainty that anyone who opposes a woman's right to suck out her baby's brain is EEEVIL! There is no such thing as an honest relativist. Everyone believes that SOMETHING is true.
Take out overweight...and perhaps low-life...but sadly, I believe the rest applies.
Check that, IMHO, anyone who would make such an unabashed political staement over his dead son and give his true killers such a pass is low-life.
Exactly so. Their supposed "openmindedness" is a false front, hiding the worst kind of biased cultlike belief system. A belief system that denies it's a belief system and mastquerades as truth, while denying that truth exists. Liberalism is a mental illness.
Just trying to figure it out makes me crazy. And I know, I used to be one. Shudder.
I was looking on a page about George Washington last night; and I read something I hadn't read before. On this page, it went through his life story. At about the end of the French and Indian War, when GW and his forces were patrolling the colonial frontier; he started having his troops wear buckskin clothes like the Indians wore. (not the same style, just the material!)
He apparently felt it was more comfortable, and easier to move around in than the cumbersome uniforms they had to wear otherwise! I'm just wondering if he felt it disguised them better, as it did for the Indians!
I was looking on a page about George Washington last night; and I read something I hadn't read before. On this page, it went through his life story. At about the end of the French and Indian War, when GW and his forces were patrolling the colonial frontier; he started having his troops wear buckskin clothes like the Indians wore. (not the same style, just the material!)
He apparently felt it was more comfortable, and easier to move around in than the cumbersome uniforms they had to wear otherwise! I'm just wondering if he felt it disguised them better, as it did for the Indians!
Call a spade a spade. Micheal Berg is an insane kook fringe Liberal whackjob.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.