Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Attacks Bush Policies on Iraq (Billy in Brazil)
The Scotsman ^ | Sat 22 May 2004

Posted on 05/22/2004 10:37:36 AM PDT by demlosers

Former United States President Bill Clinton today slammed what he called the “unilateral” foreign policy of the Bush administration.

Clinton told an audience of about 1,000 Brazilian business and political leaders that the United States needed more international partners to fight terrorism.

“Rather than taking a unilateral path, we need to strengthen international organisations,” said Clinton. “We need more international partners.”

He was speaking in Sao Paulo at the inauguration of an academic institute founded by former Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso, who led the country from 1995-2003.

“In Iraq, we should have let the United Nations inspectors finish their job,” said Clinton. Any military intervention, he added, should have involved the United Nations and a broad multinational force, rather than the “coalition of the willing” currently on the ground there.

“Iraq is about unilateralism versus internationalism,” Clinton said.

“I have a different world view (from that of the Bush administration). I believe the United States should support the World Criminal Court, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the Kyoto (environmental) Agreement and other international efforts.”

He added: “Promoting health, education and democracy is also part of an anti-terrorism strategy.”

Cardoso echoed Clinton’s theme, saying: “The unilateralism we have seen in the last two or three years is very troubling. It goes against the grain.”

Commenting specifically on US policy in Iraq, Cardoso said: “Freedom brought by force is not freedom. The situation there is very worrisome.”

Clinton said the task of bringing democracy to Iraq will be “very challenging.”

He added: “There is no doubt that the Middle East would be better off with a democratic Iraq. However, democracy cannot be imposed anywhere. The Iraqis have to want it.”

Commenting more broadly on the prospects for democracy in the world, Clinton said: “On balance, I am very optimistic. Compared to 50 years ago or 20 years ago, democracy is advancing in the world.”

He added: “In the 1990s, for the first time in history, more people were living under democracies than under dictatorships.”

He said that, currently, the world boasts some 120 democracies among the nearly 200 countries.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: appallingdems; clinton; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

1 posted on 05/22/2004 10:37:37 AM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: demlosers

The recent AIDS outbreak in the adult film industry was caused by an American porn star who made a film in Rio..Ya think?


2 posted on 05/22/2004 10:39:59 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

What a traitor. Of course, he wants us to give up our sovereignty to all the leftists and banana republics in the UN.


3 posted on 05/22/2004 10:41:17 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Pandering to second world oligarchs who are letting their own countries slide off the cliff.


4 posted on 05/22/2004 10:42:22 AM PDT by wardaddy (This is it. We either win and prevail or we lose and get tossed into that dustbin W mentioned!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Isn't it time that the Republicans said that people who travel around the world abusing their country to foreign audiences are traitors?

Clinton has been doing this for a whole lifetime, from the time he used US taxpayer dollars to organize anti-Vietnam war protests in London.

To criticize administration politics domestically is excusable, but to criticize the conduct of an American war in a foreign venue is outright treason. Republicans should say so.

Whatever happened to the custom that ex-presidents should keep their mouths shut? Whatever happened to the tradition that "politics stops at the edge of the water"? Whatever happened to the obligation for politicians of every party to pull together in time of war, which clinton so loudly asserted when he sent missiles into the desert during Monica gate and nailed a couple of camels?


5 posted on 05/22/2004 10:44:51 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Pandering to second world oligarchs who are letting their own countries slide off the cliff

For at least $100,000, a private jet, and some porn stars to rub his whatever.

6 posted on 05/22/2004 10:45:36 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Kerry is a dork))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy

Soul mate?


7 posted on 05/22/2004 10:45:44 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

And with him being the boss man.


8 posted on 05/22/2004 10:45:51 AM PDT by Unicorn (Two many wimps around The democrats would rather win the WH then win the war-Tom Delay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

What was Clintons legacy on foreign policy again???? I mean asside from running away in Somolia and bombing Serbia from 40,000 feet because he was too scared to fight Serbs on teh ground.


9 posted on 05/22/2004 10:46:41 AM PDT by Bommer (John Kerry = "You mean I can get a Purple Heart for cutting myself shaving?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

What did Toon know about Oil For Food and when did he know it?


10 posted on 05/22/2004 10:46:59 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers; Caipirabob
Freedom brought by force is not freedom.

Yeah, tell that to Poland, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Japan, etc. etc.

Clintoon should just attend to what he's really there for.

11 posted on 05/22/2004 10:47:48 AM PDT by martin_fierro (</pith>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Anybody still doubt that he has his sights on a high position in the UN?


12 posted on 05/22/2004 10:48:59 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

The outstanding characteristic in G.W. Bush's performance is leadership: whereas the best of all characteristics in W.J. Clinton's performance was ... following the crowd.


13 posted on 05/22/2004 10:49:39 AM PDT by Stagerite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"Freedom brought by force is not freedom. "

You’re a freak’n nut case for saying that. When tyrants attack freedom, it must be defended by force. What a freak’n moron…

14 posted on 05/22/2004 10:50:50 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
"“Rather than taking a unilateral path, we need to strengthen international organisations,” said Clinton. "

35 nations is not “unilateral”.

15 posted on 05/22/2004 10:51:46 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

So much for politics stopping at the water's edge.

Clinton always was and always will be one of the country's "Hate America First" crowd. He is a repulsive creature and may he rot.


16 posted on 05/22/2004 10:51:51 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Unfortunately, we all know Clinton's only view was the top of an intern's head. He's bashing Bush when all this is a result of his watch.


17 posted on 05/22/2004 10:52:36 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Clinton and Carter are two ex-presidents who cannot keep their mouths shut unlike other president who had some class.


18 posted on 05/22/2004 10:52:44 AM PDT by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
What a traitor. Of course, he wants us to give up our sovereignty to all the leftists and banana republics in the UN.

After pondering this, I don't think that's the goal. It's a consequence of course. In the long run, our dem socialists don't want to lose power to anyone including Europeans, etc. The democrats are using this as an issue to attack Bush and to move the country towards European style socialism.

19 posted on 05/22/2004 10:53:09 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Well isn't that special, Bill Clinton chimes in, the man who couldn't keep his hands off the hired help at the White House is criticizing the man who has been cleaning up the mess he left behind.

Bill Clinton should quit giving speeches on foreign policy and stick to things he is good at, like Rape, Fraud, Perjury, Campaign Finance violations and Dereliction of Duty

20 posted on 05/22/2004 10:53:13 AM PDT by MJY1288 (Our Wounded Soldiers at Walter Reed Have Yet to be Visited by John Kerry. What's he Afraid of?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson