I don't think all the articles stating Mr. Abraham's view, differentiating between the average muslim and radical fundamentalists, 'jihadists' and terrorists are written by people being fooled by a muslim "trojan horse". Nor do I think the White House is being fooled.
That sentence is a bit hard to follow. But I'll cut you some slack because it appears that English isn't your native tongue.
Anderson certainly produced a thought provoking treatise. But he is only one voice among many.
Steve Emerson & Daniel Pipes have both put forth studied analyses of how deeply the jihadi mindset is rooted in islam.
Which brings me back to the main point of my previous post that you either purposely avoided or it went over your head.
So, I will restate & (hopefully) simplify:
If the great majority of muslims oppose the position of the radical jihadi, why is it not publicly denounced worldwide?
The silence of 1.2 billion people speaks volumes.
IMO, it is either naive or disingenuous to suggest otherwise.