You told me on another thread on this topic that nothing that conservatives (in your experience -- I'll have to trust you on that) had argued to date on the subject of exposing marriage to redefinition by homosexuals for their own purposes was substantive or cogent enough for you to alter your phlegmatic view that "change happens".
Pinging you to this thread -- what you think of Satinover's arguments, since you didn't like mine?
From Satinover's article quoted above,
What is known, from decades of research on family structure, studying literally thousands of children, is that every departure from the traditional, stable, mother-father family has severe detrimental effects upon children; and these effects persist not only into adulthood but into the next generation as well.[Emphasis added.]In short, the central problem with mother-mother or father-father families is that they deliberately institute, and intend to keep in place indefinitely, a family structure known to be deficient in being obligatorily and permanently either fatherless or motherless.