[Dimensio]

Order lack of confusion. A tree is a tree and there are numerous "species" of trees. A cow is a cow and may well come in all colors and sizes and body shapes.

Ah, so this just ties into your fallacy that species are anything but human definition.

Based upon what authority do you claim no predefined property of life forms?

Based upon observable evidence, such as that which I explained to you.

We in flesh bodies can only see in one dimension, evolution is about what has happened to the "flesh" over a vast amount of time.

We in the "flesh" can see in three dimensions, actually. And we can remember things fourth-dimensionally. Moreover, our perception of three-dimensional space allows us to extrapolate reliably about events that occured in the past.

Your response is an attempt to use what you think are fancy words to hide your lack of a real answer.

The status of what is found at this point in time does not change the origination of "flesh".

What does this have to do with anything?

No, observing things now does not change what happened in the past. No one has claimed this.

Evolution does not explain the "spirit" body.

No, it doesn't. It also doesn't explain gravitational attraction. That doesn't make it false either. And, unlike the "spirit body", gravitational attraction can actually be demonstrated to exist with some degree of certainty.

Evolution keeps evolving, no way possible to understand something that ignores the whole picture.

Once again, you make absolutely no sense. You're throwing out words in the hopes that you'll make me think that you're speaking too intelligently for me and I'll concede the point out of confusion. I'm not that dumb. You're not making sense, and you're not even trying to make sense and I am not falling for it.

volution gives power to those that elevate themselves to positions of power and authority and upon that basis alone I reject that because through whatever means possible an individual becomes a dictator can claim that he/she is superior because they drew life's evolution lottery.

In other words, you reject evolution because you don't like the consequences -- a logical fallacy. Moreover, the "consequences" that you don't like are utterly bogus, not actual consequences of the theory of evolution but rather your hopelessly wrong idea of what evolution is.

[Just mythoughts]

"Ah, so this just ties into your fallacy that species are anything but human definition."

My fallacy, that is your definition.


"Based upon observable evidence, such as that which I explained to you."

Your evidence does not explain origination only explains what is know about species.


"We in the "flesh" can see in three dimensions, actually. And we can remember things fourth-dimensionally. Moreover, our perception of three-dimensional space allows us to extrapolate reliably about events that occured in the past."


I was describing what the naked eye can do. Now you have stumbled into the "fog" of evolution theory, memory and perception, no way to examine that evidence from rocks and fossils.

The status of what is found at this point in time does not change the origination of "flesh".

"What does this have to do with anything?"

Until that first "living" organism is located and examined as evidence, the best one can do is to take what is available and "guess" what the data means as to the origination. It has everything to do with the veracity of a fact based theory, one that just keeps evolving to make darn sure that it can claim there was no Creator, especially one who still exists and is in control. The origin of "life" is what evolution is suppose to explain.

"No, observing things now does not change what happened in the past. No one has claimed this."

This is not true, everytime time there is a "new" discovery the E's never use it to give credit to the possibility of a Creator, rather it is used to disprove a Creator.

Evolution does not explain the "spirit" body.

No, it doesn't. It also doesn't explain gravitational attraction. That doesn't make it false either. And, unlike the "spirit body", gravitational attraction can actually be demonstrated to exist with some degree of certainty.


Finally something we agree upon. Interesting that gravity, what do you suppose it will take to explain that "law". Actually if the E's had any understanding in the "spirit body", they would then have the missing links they keep looking for in the physical flesh body. But that understanding comes from the Creator and since they refuse to accept a Creator won't be given that data.



"In other words, you reject evolution because you don't like the consequences -- a logical fallacy. Moreover, the "consequences" that you don't like are utterly bogus, not actual consequences of the theory of evolution but rather your hopelessly wrong idea of what evolution is."


I reject evolution not only because of what is the consequences, but because it is not true. Evolution is a religion, void of a Creator, who is in control of all things, from the Beginning (whenever that was) this earth age (time) and that age (time) to come. By the way I do not believe this earth is 6,000 years old the evidence disproves that story.