[whattajoke]

Until that first "living" organism is located and examined as evidence, the best one can do is to take what is available and "guess" what the data means as to the origination...

Another OJ juror...

The origin of "life" is what evolution is suppose to explain.

Really. Please send me the literature that backs this up. I would think I'd have been aware of this sweeping change to evolutionary theory. HINT: You are blatantly wrong.

everytime time there is a "new" discovery the E's never use it to give credit to the possibility of a Creator, rather it is used to disprove a Creator.

A much better and more accurate statement would be, "everytime there is a 'new' discovery, scientists never ever mention anything about a supernatural deity." Just trying to help.

Actually if the E's had any understanding in the "spirit body", they would then have the missing links they keep looking for in the physical flesh body

Huh? First of all, I'm sure quite a number of "E's" understand the "spirit body." But... which "spirit body" are you referring too? My Navajo friend has quite a different idea about it than you do, I'm sure. Your 2nd sentence is a bit too off the wall for me.

I reject evolution not only because of what is the consequences,

Which are? Less coral reefs in the world?

but because it is not true.

Wrong.

Evolution is a religion,

Wrong.

void of a Creator,

Right. All science avoids supernatural explanations.

By the way I do not believe this earth is 6,000 years old the evidence disproves that story.

Hooray. Perhaps BibChr and bondserv would like to discuss this with you, however.

[Just mythoughts]

You laugh now, but as the old saying goes He who laughs last laughs longest, whattajoke.