Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gabz
The issue between smokers and non-smokers would not have and never should have become political, except for money.

Good point. In fact, if it were only public opinion driving the issue, a smoker would no more think of lighting up in public than he would think of urinating in public. The fact that this has never been the case tends to show that nonsmokers are willing to put up with smokers, if it's only a matter of public opinion. But I think the attitude of the nonsmokers in reference to the political side of the question is somewhat on the lines of "since I don't really care one way or the other, I'm not going to get involved." If the nonsmokers don't get involved, the smokers will never win.

28 posted on 05/21/2004 3:54:40 PM PDT by Agnes Heep (Solus cum sola non cogitabuntur orare pater noster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Agnes Heep

I have always been thankful to the non-smokers that oppose the government imposed smoking bans.

You and I have discussed this enough that you know I encourage non-smokers to speak with the owners - instead of going to the government.


29 posted on 05/21/2004 4:10:13 PM PDT by Gabz (Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my second hand smoke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson