[LS]

Sigh. We've been over this. Bush gave up NOTHING because he did not plan any more recess appointments (probably because Brown and Owens, among others, didn't WANT them). So he got something for nothing.

It's funny that here on FR, people constantly wring their hands over these "deals," yet NRO (I think) quoted a prominent unnamed Democrat as saying that every time there is a deal, it looks initially like the Dems win, then, by the end of the week, they figure out they've lost. I see no downside to this IF Bush planned no more recess appointments.

[Area51]

It's funny that here on FR, people constantly wring their hands over these "deals," yet NRO (I think) quoted a prominent unnamed Democrat as saying that every time there is a deal, it looks initially like the Dems win, then, by the end of the week, they figure out they've lost. I see no downside to this IF Bush planned no more recess appointments.


60 posted on 05/21/2004 6:07:46 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

---

Here's the down side. The Left is using a process that is NOT written anywhere nor supported by any ruling claiming the need of 60 votes to place a Judicial Nominee.
yet is continues for what 4 years almost.

Yeah some real spunk in the Leadership of the Repulican Senate and White House. Let's give em another 4 years so they can completely assimilate the Democrats.