Posted on 05/20/2004 12:47:08 PM PDT by Serb5150
Oh how clever are the fagots. "We know that even the International Red Cross accepts blood..." implies that "lesser" organizations, such as the American Red Cross, "accepts blood from men who have sex with men." Have you seen the questionnaire the American Red Cross has a potential donor fill out? I don't believe it explicitly asks if you're a queer. But it does ask if you have had same sex. It even asks if you've been to certain South African countries where AIDS is rampant. If you answer yes to any of these questions, they ask that you not give blood. Mr. Sklar is correct that there is a 72 hour test. And the American Red Cross applies this test to the donated blood. No doubt this test, or something similar will be used for the sperm as well.
If they want to reproduce, let them do it like the rest of us!
Yeah. Let them sneak up on their wifes while they are sleeping.
That is wrong!!!! :)
The US Red Cross does not accept blood from who have had sex with men.
Unfortunately HIV isn't the only disease homosexuals are known to suffer from. Testing their blood will cost a small fortune.
I read your response before I read your handle.... creeped me out there for a moment
.
I don't completely accept the hypothesis that homosexual behavior is of genetic origin. But in this case, better safe than sorry.
If a woman truly desires to be impregnated by defective germ cells, she could always advertise for such in the classified section of some seedy free newspaper. Or find a french guy.
I know gays cannot donate plasma. I do not think they can donate blood to the American Red Cross. No one has the RIGHT to donate.
anonymous donations to sperm banks
Okay... either this means that "anonymous" just means you can't find out the donors name, but the rest of the key Phenotypic info (height, weight, race, etc.) is included. In this case, is there really a large call for "homosexual" on the list of traits or doesn't that matter?
If anonymous means "we don't have any idea who it came from, just some guy who showed up and got paid", would anyone choose that for artificial insemination???
Owl_Eagle
" WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH"
Now it is just a Starbucks for the homoly inclined!
I've been listening to so-called "gays" (who always seem to be unhappy) claim for the last 10 years that their sexual orientation is hard-wired into their psyches. If true, that sounds genetic to me. So, why would they want to pass it on?
No offense meant by my comment. Just asking...
Why would a "gay' flinch from simply saying no?
"better safe, than sorry"
you bet.
One who was interested only in donating wouldn't.
The International Red Cross must have less stringent rules than the American Red Cross. The American Red Cross won't take blood from anyone who has spent 6 months or more in Europe since January 1, 1980, because of the mad cow scare, but the European branches of the IRC can't possibly have a rule like that (or they would have to be importing all of their blood supplies from other continents).
Their desire to donate shouldn't obligate the sperm banks to accept an unwanted donation. I've been turned down by the Salvation Army before when I brought in items they didn't think would sell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.