Skip to comments.
RUSH CALLER: IRAQ - "Rules Have Changed" - Soldiers in Iraq Cannot Respond to Incoming Mortar Fire
Rush Limbaugh Program
| 2004-05-20
| A Caller to Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 05/20/2004 12:11:09 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: Huck
I have not seen or heard one thing to cause me to waver as to whether we are doing as well as we can. My God, Bush has defeated three terrorist regimes in 3 yrs. (one without firing a shot in its direction) and people "wonder?"
I wonder what the hell they expect.
21
posted on
05/20/2004 12:25:54 PM PDT
by
justshutupandtakeit
(America's Enemies: foreign and domestic RATmedia agree Bush must be destroyed.)
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
But by the time he left Iraq, soldiers literally had to take incoming mortar rounds without responding or actually have someone shot before returning fireSorry, but I find this extremely hard to believe.
22
posted on
05/20/2004 12:27:06 PM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
And as soon as you do that, every says, "Ahh. So Iraq isn't going to be an open democracy after all!" That won't work.
EVERYONE HERE ON FR NEEDS TO FIGURE THIS OUT: we are in a new age, and for better or worse the media is a part of the equation. The "embeds" was a brilliant end-run around the media, and it can't be the only strategy. But censorship in the age of satellite phones and the internet is NO LONGER AN OPTION.
We need to look forward, not backward to WW II, to figure out NEW ways of circumventing the leftist press.
23
posted on
05/20/2004 12:27:08 PM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
To: Dead Dog
On FR, I have been referred to as "racist bigot", "tothless white trash", "wannabe troopie", "National Guard Imitation Soldier Boy", and other things I don't care to hear.
And those are just by the famous, sleep-at-JimRob's-feet paleo-FReepers.
Does that all sound like "bitchy, nit pick disagreements", to you?
24
posted on
05/20/2004 12:27:11 PM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(It's not Bush's fault - It's THE MEDIA'S fault!)
To: COEXERJ145
25
posted on
05/20/2004 12:27:45 PM PDT
by
Taquito
To: Old Sarge
And which of those isn't true? (Just kidding!)
26
posted on
05/20/2004 12:27:57 PM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
To: Guillermo
That is b.s. and the call probably is too. Anyone can claim to be anything on a radio call. I don't believe any of it sounds like Rush got snookered and the rabid here fall for it.
27
posted on
05/20/2004 12:28:26 PM PDT
by
justshutupandtakeit
(America's Enemies: foreign and domestic RATmedia agree Bush must be destroyed.)
To: Old Sarge
28
posted on
05/20/2004 12:28:36 PM PDT
by
Taquito
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
I heard it. It was a compelling call.
29
posted on
05/20/2004 12:28:53 PM PDT
by
sauropod
(Paleo-cons make better lovers)
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
o The media is killing us - deliberately.
o The politicians and field commanders are buckling to the pressure from the reported images.
o The people in America are virtually clueless as to what we are fighting for or the threat they pose due to their hate.
The people are clueless because the media and the educators have never told them the truth. Anyone who has grown up in America in the past 50 years or so has been told: "Saladin good -- Crusaders bad." The media suppress the facts in the Middle East and the facts about Islam.
As for the second point, the Republican politicians are caving. The Democrat politicians have helped organize the media blackout and are working closely with the press to demonize Bush.
Apparently the only way to get the word out to people is for them to see for themselves. A few nuked cities maybe. I don't know what else will do it. And even that will be spun by the press as far as they can.
30
posted on
05/20/2004 12:29:34 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Jeff did say there is a reporter on every street corner and they are ready to shove a camera into a soldier's face.
They are looking for everything they can to turn the American people against the war.
31
posted on
05/20/2004 12:29:40 PM PDT
by
LADY J
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Soldiers in Iraq Cannot Respond to Incoming Mortar FireThat's not exactly what he said...
32
posted on
05/20/2004 12:29:56 PM PDT
by
Future Snake Eater
("Oh boy, I can't wait to eat that monkey!"--Abe Simpson)
To: Old Sarge
On FR, I have been referred to as "racist bigot", "tothless white trash"Those are some of my better qualities....
33
posted on
05/20/2004 12:31:19 PM PDT
by
freebilly
(Vote Kerry-- 1 Billion Muslims Can't Be Wrong....)
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
soldier "Jeff, from Morehead OK" calling in to Rush Limbaugh explained that in Iraq wedding parties and funerals are full of people with guns who often fire on American troops that happen by.... But by the time he left Iraq, soldiers literally had to take incoming mortar rounds without responding Makes it almost sound like the Iraqi's take mortar's to wedding parties to celebrate.
34
posted on
05/20/2004 12:31:22 PM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
('The weakest link in American security is the political link' - Thomas Sowell)
To: aruanan
I understand how you drew that inference. A bit clumsy on my part. But in my defense, I did not say "Rules of Engagement". In fact, I suspect the "official" rules haven't changed. But I drew the inferrence that there is pressure from the top to not respond unless absolutely necessary for fear of media playing up every dead body. Thus the "Rules" have changed in fact if not on paper.
35
posted on
05/20/2004 12:32:15 PM PDT
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
Comment #36 Removed by Moderator
To: LS
"I'm not sure he meant that rules of engagement have changed DUE TO media interference IN THIS CASE. "
IF we're knee-jerking the rules of engagement because of the freakin' media, then this will be another VietNam...and we'll lose.
37
posted on
05/20/2004 12:33:58 PM PDT
by
FrankR
To: All
"Soldiers in Iraq Cannot Respond to Incoming Mortar Fire
That's not exactly what he said..."
True. He had said that they've TAKEN incoming mortar fire and did nothing about it, due to having to think and re-think and triple-think, instead of just doing their job, doing what they are there for.
38
posted on
05/20/2004 12:34:04 PM PDT
by
Rushgrrl
(....as Kerry waits to see what the majority thinks before speaking out....)
To: txzman
He said that every Iraqi is permitted to keep an AK-47 or pistolWell, THAT'S bs. Have a look at the new Iraqi Constitution.....
39
posted on
05/20/2004 12:35:11 PM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: LS
I believe that we can locate the location of the firing mortar using radar. There is no need to visually spot the piece.
40
posted on
05/20/2004 12:36:55 PM PDT
by
bagman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson