Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[NJ] Governor Pushes Property-Tax Relief Plan [via income redistribution]
The [Allentown NJ] Examiner ^ | May 20, 2004 | COLLEEN LUTOLF

Posted on 05/19/2004 9:11:37 PM PDT by walford

In a tour to promote his new tax relief plan, Gov. James E. McGreevey last week sat with reporters to review his "three-pronged" FAIR (Fair and Immediate Relief) tax relief plan.

The plan includes what McGreevey has dubbed a "millionaires’ tax" that would place a 2.6 percent tax on households making $500,000 or more annually, as well as a 2.5 percent cap on administrative spending and a proposed constitutional convention on property taxes that would allow New Jersey’s citizens to make recommendations to the state legislation.

While eating what appeared to be a turkey sandwich, McGreevey said the millionaires’ tax, which one critic called a "Robin Hood fairy-tale" would raise $800 million for property tax relief.

McGreevey said that under President George W. Bush’s tax cuts, a family earning $550,000 received a $19,000 break. If McGreevey’s plan is instituted, that family will lose $825 of that amount annually.

The governor said the $800 million raised through the tax on high income taxpayers, which he said would be introduced to the Legislature this week, will be used only for property-tax relief.

"This doesn’t happen without the millionaires’ tax," he said. "Every dime, every cent goes back to property tax reform."

"I would argue that this is fair and equitable and the right thing to do," McGreevey said. "We all understand the importance of keeping seniors and middle class families in their homes."

Under the plan, approximately 40,000 seniors who are currently eligible for a maximum $775 homestead rebate, will see the maximum rebate rise to $1,200. The average rebate is expected to be $760.

Homeowners who earn less than $125,000 a year, will receive a maximum rebate of $800, according to a press release from the governor’s office.

McGreevey also proposes a 2.5 percent cap on administrative spending for municipalities and school districts.

"As a state, we need to look at innovative ways to control administrative costs," McGreevey, who served as mayor of Woodbridge Township before he was elected to his first term as governor, said.

Despite insurance rates increasing about 20 percent a year and teachers’ contracts also increasing annually, McGreevey did answer a question about whether he would be willing to take on the state’s teachers’ unions.

"The cap is the cap is the cap," he said. "It’s a 2.5 percent cap in overall spending."

McGreevey said New Jersey districts spend more in administrative costs than any state in the nation.

"The money needs to be in the classroom," he said. "This is good public policy."

McGreevey said he was not an "enthusiastic supporter" of the constitutional convention because the constitution is an "almost sacred document." Still, the governor said he was convinced to propose a constitutional convention on property tax reform to voters in 2005, which could be an election year for him.

"I wasn’t an enthusiastic supporter of the constitutional convention," he said. "But [former] Governor [Brendan] Byrne convinced me that it’s not the only way to fix the property tax crisis, but it is the best way."

McGreevey said 2005 was the first year that a constitutional convention could occur.

He said the state’s economic circumstances have greatly improved and that New Jersey’s revenues are the fourth strongest in the nation. He said his first two years in office, revenues were down.

McGreevey said the second reason that 2005 may be the right time for the convention is because "it will take time."

"A citizens task force will ensure an open, inclusive process," he said, adding that although time is needed to achieve a consensus, a citizens task force could be announced soon.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: elitism; marxism; millionairetax; soaktherich; socialism
I just heard Bill O'Reilly offer this as today's absurdity. This newspaper and the governor are spinning this as property tax relief. The fact is, taxes will be raised on people earning over a certain amount. These monies [after the bureaucracy gets its cut] will then be redistributed to property owners earning below an arbitrary ceiling.

Sure seems like from each according to relative success to each according to relative lack thereof.

1 posted on 05/19/2004 9:11:38 PM PDT by walford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: walford
The fact is, taxes will be raised on people earning over a certain amount. These monies [after the bureaucracy gets its cut] will then be redistributed to property owners earning below an arbitrary ceiling

I must be missing something...The very rich just got a tax cut/refund but the gov't didn't lose any money...They just shifted the burden to yours truely, me...

What's that called??? Lack of wealth distribution??? The Democrats want the rich to pay all the taxes and the Republicans want all of us poor to pay all of the taxes...

Let's do something different...Let the people with incomes between 150 and 300 thousand pay all the taxes and the rest of us get a free ride for a change...

2 posted on 05/19/2004 10:12:11 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

This is a political ploy by McGreevey for reelection.

Come on, there are 28,000 people that will be taxed. The proceeds will go to a couple of hundred thousand people. The sum of the recipients are greater than the ones being taxed.

Hence, it weighs better for McGreevey in terms of votes. "Looky here, Democrats gave you a homestead rebate." It isn't "looky here, Democrats raised taxes for political gain."


3 posted on 05/20/2004 5:43:15 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Only difference between the liberals and the Nazis is that the liberals love the Communists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz; Iscool

I hadn't considered that aspect. It's a classic buy-the-votes scheme using involuntary contributions.


4 posted on 05/20/2004 7:20:21 AM PDT by walford (http://utopia-unmasked.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson