Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freeeee
Keeping dissenters away protects the supporters more than the dignitaries. Or don't the little people count?

And I thought this was about the gay event.

144 posted on 05/19/2004 2:40:59 PM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: AmishDude
Keeping dissenters away protects the supporters more than the dignitaries. Or don't the little people count?

Ok, I'll give you that one. However, I would put that in the "nanny state" category with seatbelt laws. When one goes somewhere where protesters are likely to be, there is always an inherent risk. If activities with inherent risks are outlawed, few if any human behaviors will remain unregulated. And important rights that made America great such as free speech, free assembly and the right to keep and bear arms will be but a memory.

And I thought this was about the gay event.

There was a very heated thread recently about Bush's security threatening protesters with arrest. I thought it relevent here because I wanted to see if the people who opposed me on the other thread would be consistent, or be hypocrites. It appears we have both.

150 posted on 05/19/2004 2:49:29 PM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson