Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mbraynard
But I do stand by the point that the men they are pursuing aren't so interested in marrying someone just like themselves.

That's a debatable point. Personally, I'd find it intolerable to date, much less marry, some touchy-feely "sensitive" man--I have absolutely no patience for all of that mushy stuff. (Few people are as logical as I am.) Maybe you're not looking for someone exactly like yourself, but I don't think you'd want someone completely different, either.

31 posted on 05/19/2004 8:41:06 PM PDT by exDemMom (Think like a liberal? Oxymoron!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom

I see your point. You are reflecting on something actually more important than the interest of the women in the article - emotional disposition. The women in the article are whining about not being able to find a man with a similar set of diplomas on the wall.


33 posted on 05/20/2004 8:26:10 AM PDT by mbraynard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: exDemMom; Karyn M. PhD

The best marriages are made when one spouse wears the pants and the other wears the panties.

Even look at the gay 'marriages'.

Somebody needs to say those famous hallmark words of the successful couple - "Yes Dear".

At the rate things are going, I recommend that women interested in 'marrying up' learn to speak Chinese or Hindi.


34 posted on 05/20/2004 3:14:13 PM PDT by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson