Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: isatoi
This raises yet another good point, there was blood all over the ground where they appeared to be sawing his head off, so why was there no blood on his outfit nor on the head itself??????????

That's what I've been saying. I saw the tape and I now suspect there's more than one "version" floating around because on mine, I didn't see any blood on the floor, on the jumpsuit, spurting across the room, on the bad dudes' hands, and the face was clean as a whistle when it was placed on the body. Let me repeat that - THE FACE WAS CLEAN AS A WHISTLE WHEN IT WAS PLACED ON THE BODY. The only time I saw what might have been something that might have been blood was when the head was lifted into the air. Of course the "something" could have been skin, hair, or even a dust bunny but it was just a single something rather than a stream, spurt, or dripping blood. My theory, since I obviously wasn't there, is he was already dead and they thought later it'd be a great bit of Hollywood and bragging rights to add a beheading to the video.

56 posted on 05/18/2004 1:10:40 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: mtbopfuyn
My theory, since I obviously wasn't there, is he was already dead and they thought later it'd be a great bit of Hollywood and bragging rights to add a beheading to the video.

An autopsy, if it were done, should have been able to confirm that (according to Quincy).

61 posted on 05/18/2004 1:17:40 PM PDT by atomicpossum (Hey, I wouldn't touch Camryn Manheim's uterus on a bet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson