The kids kept interrupting; the post was premature.
Your inference is not based on fact, only circumstantial evidence.
What a shame that the "rough draft" interrupted the gist of the message.
Did you even bother to examine the book list?
Sure, I think you posted a great reading list. That wasn't really related to my point, which was to dispute that a well-educated person must necessarily have college-level coursework in mathematics (or, if specializing in mathematics, other areas). My point was that we all have gifts in different areas and as adults don't necessarily have to continue to be a "jack of all trades" educationally speaking.
My inferences were based on the facts as presented to me, which is all any of us have to work with on the list :). As a parent of 4 I can understand if the note as posted did not fairly present your abilities!