I'm not really following your logic here as far as your sources of information.
I'm not really surprised at that, either - you may as well start citing "emperor's clothes" or the ICDSM and have done with it.
You obviously have some difficulty reading articles/posts in their entirety. You wouldn't happen to be related to RBJ who also has problems reading entire posts? This was actually quoting documents from the German Foreign Office concerning Kosovo Albanians prior to the war:
"The Foreign Office documents were responses to the courts' needs in deciding the status of Kosovo-Albanian refugees in Germany."
"3. Intelligence report from the Foreign Office, January 12, 1999 to the Administrative Court of Trier (Az: 514-516.80/32 426):"
"4. Intelligence report from the Foreign Office January 6, 1999 to the Bavarian Administrative Court, Ansbach: "
"5. Report of the Foreign Office March 15, 1999 (Az: 514-516,80/33841) to the Administrative Court, Mainz:"
As I said to you in post #45:
"So you can basically say that according to you, unless a source repeats the common line, than it is not true, can not be trusted, or is biased?
Well we all know what the common line was/is from Capital Hill and they don't ever "fabricate" do they? And when it comes to figures concerning the war, well do I really need to comment? We all know about the numbers that were quoted and the way they happened to shrink as the war progressed (or should I say degressed). I really don't think we need to go into a discussion about the lies told by NATO when it comes to the Kosovo attack on Serbia. They are so well known already."
"I'm I'm not really following your logic here" either "as far as your sources of information" as to what is fact and what is fabrications.
"I'm not really surprised at that, either - you may as well start citing" CNN!