Indiana is fairly reasonable with their CCW permits, and I've seen "shady" cases go in favor of the lawful gun owner who shoots the perp. This case sounds a bit strange...He took the gun away, then fired 15 times?
The article implies that without stating it. But when was the last time the media distorted a story? The order in which the shooting and taking the gun is key to the story, but it just says "and" instead of "then".