"Sans cojones" is right. I just can't help but thinking that even if we changed the constitution, those activist judges would find that the change itself was 'unconstitutional'.
If I had been in the Mass Legislature, I would have sponsored a resolution stating that the SJC was attempting to supplant the legislature by writing a law and demand they revisit their opinion. If I had been Governor, I would have issued an executive order to ignore the ruling and not issue any kind of paper recognizing a homosexual relationship. The two acts togther should constitute a reasonable check-n-balance against the court, forcing the court to issue a new ruling.
But I am neither, nor do I live in Mass.
Shalom.