Forerly most liberal State Senator in Massachusetts. Her chief of staff lost the seat to a republican over the gay marriage issue.
The President HAS to force Congress to vote on the Amendment this year.
And who is it that is turning this into a big issue as of late?
Sounds like "We're queer, we're here, and you HAVE to like it."
For any Homosexual to charge any one else with hypocracy--
is redundency.for those who choose to live a LIE-For whose choice of behavior is against nature itself-and so self
and socially destructive would be humerous had the
"already captured Liberal Establishment and the Press" not
ceded so many victories to the enemy of Othodox Jews and
Christians."My people are destroyed for lack of understanding."
"I say, Mr. President, you would not be living in the White House but for a 'few activist judges,'" Foreman said in a press release.
One more example of how this queer is not living in the real world where he is a heterosexual man in a heterosexual body who wants to act like a homosexual.
Without an independent judiciary, Foreman said, segregation would still be legal; abortion and interracial marriages would still be illegal; and poor people accused of crimes would have no right to legal counsel.
Segregation? It is still legal, as long as you are not a white male trying to keep out someone else. Women and all minority groups can still keep everyone else out of their institutions. Abortion? Murder should be illegal. Interracial marriages? Might be illegal but I doubt it. Poor people and legal counsel? Someone will have to help me on that one.
Foreman said the only reason President Bush is urging Congress to act "is to continue to use the lives of committed same-sex couples to divide America for partisan gain."
I don't think it was President Bush who started this one. If you throw down the gauntlet, you can't be surprised if someone takes up the challenge. He also accused President Bush of "sullying" the 50th anniversary of the Brown vs. Board of Education desegregation ruling "by renewing his support for amending the U.S. Constitution to enshrine discrimination against a minority."
I hope perverts are in the minority and I hope we continue to discriminate against them.
"President Bush is attempting to lead this nation into discrimination. We will not let him hurt our families," said HRC President Cheryl Jacques.
You don't have families, you have mutual admiration groupings that abuse children for your own gain. To have a family, you have to start with a man married to a woman with a lifetime committment.
Jacques said President Bush should "work to unite Americans" rather than using the Constitution to "separate some from the rest."
Oh, that is a good one. The Constitition is used to separate those who want a Republican form of governmen from those who want a Monarchy. Does the stupid statement quoted above still apply? It isn't divisive to call perversion perversion any more than it is divisive to call stupidity stupidity.
The Human Rights Campaign says support for passage of the Federal Marriage Amendment has stagnated in the last several weeks.
Only one way to answer that, FReepers.
Let's Roll
Shalom.
"Activists Blast President Bush for Hypocrisy" ... First, degenerates aren't exactly a reliable rouce to define someone else's hypocrisy. Second, if the degenerates are mad at our President, then he must be on the right track!
The media is having a video blackout of homosexuals kissing in the courthouse. Notice how the only pictures are not inclueding the freashow marriages. In fact the only video they show is of two men in suits and anther two holding a baby boy.
Kerry supports homosexual marriages. He has a 100% voting record for the HRC. Bluntly a vote for the Democrat party is a vote to homosexualize children. A bit extreme but with groups like GlSEN in the public schools, very true.
Homosexuals are trying to spin the issue as DOA just as democrats have called every budge DOA.
They rail against recess appointments but have been bypassed.
The problem in the senate is the fact that republicans think they are in a country club and need to be polite. They are fools. This is a political blood sport and they need to make this public and exposed. They need the force the alchoholic ted kenedy to take a stand, they need to force John F'n Kerry to side with the homosexuals.
It should also be noted that this is not a negative ban on homosexuals it is an affirmative statment of what marriage is defined. FMA does not evenvision every wacko variation of a "marriage" it simply says marriage is this and kicks the rest back to the states. (where the issue belongs.)
This is an albatross we need to hang around the neck of every little and big democrat candidate this season.
IOW:
"Democrat? I didn't know you were a homosexual..."
Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, blasted President Bush on Monday, after Bush said, "the sacred institution of marriage should not be redefined by a few activist judges."
The brown shirts of the Gay Gestapo speak again:
Homosexual leader vows to 'torture' opponents
The head of a national homosexual organization is vowing to politically "punish," "terrify" and "torture" activists who oppose his organization's agenda on "gay" rights – which he says would give him "endless satisfaction."
Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay & Lesbian Task Force in Washington, D.C., made the comments in yesterday's edition of Between the Lines, a Detroit area homosexual newsmagazine, the American Family Association of Michigan points out.
In addition to declaring his desire for retribution against "local legislators and leaders" who oppose the homosexual agenda, Foreman expressed a goal beyond securing legal same-sex marriage, that is gaining other means besides marriage by which homosexuals could access public and private financial benefits.
Foreman told the interviewer of his plans to go after his opponents.
"I'm … interested in going after, politically, local legislators and leaders that have launched these anti-gay initiatives," he explained. "'We beat you, now we're gonna go back and we're going to affirmatively punish you' – people who launch this stuff, so that they understand not only that they're not going to win, but that there are consequences to it.
"We would set up a [political action committee] and go in and terrify them with a credible challenge. ... So we go in, for a modest investment of money and torture these people, which would give me endless satisfaction. And the word would go out very quickly, 'You know what, this really isn't worth it...'"