[epigone73]

Are you INSANE?

An attack would not help Bush at all, moron!

Perhaps a simple case of 'projection'?

that is, you wouldn't weep too bitterly if an attack cost bush the election, and would blame it on bush's incompetence.

So, if we are not attacked, it's because Bush didn't think he needed the extra votes and sympathy. But if we ARE attacked, then Bush is incompetent and/or evil, depending on your needs at the moment.

Unafathomably stupid evil

[torchthemummy]

"Are you INSANE?

An attack would not help Bush at all, moron!"

Hey, Newbie - tone it down! Coherence will surely follow.

[Shane]

No need for name calling here. We appreciate civil discourse. We welcome your opinions, but there is no need to insult others who may differ.

[AngieGOP]

"an attack would not help Bush at all..."

How would it help an unproven commodity like Kerry? We know that Bush wouldn't roll over like Clinton (and Kerry). He would strike back and harder.