Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: River_Wrangler
You are right. To expand on your number three. Until Bush, as Govenor of Texas gave them a waiver refineries couldn't implement upgrades unless they brought them up to 100% EPA standards, so a 70% improvement was sacrificed because it was not cost effective to pay for the 100% improvement. If Bush hadn't granted waivers to the Texas refineries the supply situation would be even more critical than it is today.

As an earlier post explained we have not built a new refinery for 27 years, ROI is lousy, NIMBYs prevent any increase in existing capacity. Added to the fact that we are not building enough electricity generating capacity and our natural gas supply is about to go critical, we are headed for an energy supply crunch in the not too distant future.

35 posted on 05/17/2004 7:38:46 AM PDT by Timocrat (I Emanate on your Auras and Penumbras Mr Blackmun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Timocrat

Most correct!


43 posted on 05/17/2004 8:48:58 AM PDT by River_Wrangler (Gun powder for me and a beer for my horse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson