Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lynndie England: I Wasn't Ordered to Abuse Detainees
NewsMax ^ | 5-16-04

Posted on 05/16/2004 9:32:23 AM PDT by jmstein7

The female GI who is at the center of the storm over allegations of mistreatment at Baghdad's Abu Ghraib prison has told military investigators that she received no specific orders to abuse detainees.

A transcript of her May 5 military interview obtained by the New York Times shows England was asked, "Did anyone ever give specific orders of how to 'break' detainees?"

"No," England answered point blank. Instead she told probers that military intelligence merely encouraged them to keep doing whatever they were doing to soften prisoners up - "that we were doing a good job."

If true, England's admission suggests that the idea to use sexual humiliation to break Iraqi prisoners originated with the accused MPs - and not with higher-ups on site or at the Pentagon.

A lawyer for Specialist Charles Graner seemed to echo England's comments, telling the Times that the orders his client was following were usually general in nature.

"Most are not specific. Some are pretty clear. The exact wording, it's hard to say," attorney Gary Womack told the paper.

Neal Puckett, the lawyer for Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski who oversaw Abu Ghraib, said the testimony by England and others would complicate any legal defense attempting to pin blame on higher-ups.

"I think they are going to have a hard time demonstrating that they were instructed, that they were to specifically to strip these guys naked and pile them up on the floor," Puckett told the Times.

Court records of interviews with other suspects in the Iraqi prison abuse scandal show that military intelligence officers might have authorized interrogation tactics that included sleep and food deprivation and intimidation with muzzled dogs.

But the same witnesses said none of the orders sanctioned hitting Iraqi detainees, building naked pyramids or having them photographed while simulating sex acts.


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: charlesgraner; iraqabuse; iraqipow; lyndieengland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: jmstein7
If true, England's admission suggests that the idea to use sexual humiliation to break Iraqi prisoners originated with the accused MPs - and not with higher-ups on site or at the Pentagon.

So the New Yorker Magazine article from Hersh is wrong. Wonder when there will be an apology issued?

61 posted on 05/16/2004 6:00:02 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newfarm4000n
I think that its very convenient for the criminals like England to claim the photo's were staged remember there are 1 million "framed and innocent" people in our prisons. Perhaps FReepers shouldn't bring out the tissue's for common criminals like England.... unless the new conservatism is "criminal's rights"

What the heck are you talking about? Backup your malicious claims with evidence. Where is the proof she is a criminal.

People in our prisons? Get a grip! Theses are Iraqis and Middle Eastern suspected terrorists.

62 posted on 05/16/2004 6:18:20 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul (The BushAdm has apologized for abuse of suspected terrorists-Has the Arab world apologized for 9/11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Well, I hope the "backlash" is in the form of an Abrams M1 tank on the offensive. I'm sick of these people, whether they are in our extended family or not, they have been put on notice.

RB


63 posted on 05/16/2004 6:25:14 PM PDT by brushcop (Dad of an Army Infantryman and busy prayer life...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
a little humiliation is not torture, and that a wearing women's panties on one's head would be far preferable than losing that same head by some clumsy and inept beheader.

I disagree. If it happened to me, I would not merely be humiliated. Frankly, I would rather lose my head than be forced into participating in sexual acts with members of my own sex. No. We put far too little importance on sexual acts these days, thanks in part to Clinton.

But the main thing to be worried about is not the effect on the captives. It is what we allow ourselves to accept and to do. It you dismiss this as a little thing abroad, it will become a little thing at home. We walk a thin line already. Almost everything sexual is acceptable. We have one standing restriction - consent. Throw that out the window and what do we have left?

Do not excuse it. The president is right.

64 posted on 05/16/2004 6:28:20 PM PDT by Sockdologer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Rock N Jones

It's probably related to the fact that the backgrounds of the contract interrogators is so tinfoil/black helicopter hidden by the administration. It's been speculated, with actual circumstantial evidence, that they are associated with the IDF and Shin Bet (former workers from there or who had been trained by IDF and Shin Bet). That would be explosive information in the Arab world-- that the US is allowing those with such Israeli ties to interrogate Iraqis. So, it's kept quiet.


65 posted on 05/16/2004 7:13:51 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LoudRepublicangirl

I think the photo was published by the WaPost (I could be wrong). I've seen it on TV. Anyway, I'd guess the documentation could be found there. I know at least one of the attorneys for the guards has said it. It was an interesting picture-- taken from a second floor railing by another guard. It's the same photo, but from two separate angles-- this one shows the wires and smoke and mirrors of the shot, so to speak.


66 posted on 05/16/2004 7:16:53 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative

staged

adj 1: written for or performed on the stage; "a staged version of the novel" [ant: unstaged] 2: deliberately arranged for effect; "one of those artfully staged photographs" [syn: arranged]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Obligatorily remarking at the seriousness of the offenses of these troops, I don't see them as being deliberately set up for some other effect. It looks to me like "Gee are we having a party here, or what"

What effect do you suppose that these brilliant minds were aiming at?


67 posted on 05/17/2004 4:34:44 PM PDT by gogipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: gogipper

No, it's already been said that the pictures were used to threaten other prisoners and the families of the prisoners. Arabs aren't like Americans. Making American prisoners be humiliated would strengthen their resolve. Arab prisoners would be broken by such humiliation. All you have to do is think about how theocratic societies feel about sexual humiliation. Or, just recall that putting your boot on a picture of GHWB in the Baghdad Hotel was considered the highest insult.


68 posted on 05/18/2004 4:12:52 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative

Ten years in the Army including company command. I commanded a rapist, drug dealers, pimps in my unit and investigated charges of harrassment (cruelty) in an AR 15 investigation. I also experienced entering bachelor enlisted quarters to give a message to an NCO once and encountered him and (female) guests watching porn movies as recreation. As much as I love GI's in general, I look at those pictures and see nothing but dirtballs without adult supervision.

I also entered top secret sites and encountered the caliber of military police that provide security there.

If I were doing a planned program of the sensitivity you describe, I wouldn't assign Specialist Homer and Maybelle Tentpeg to do it.


69 posted on 05/18/2004 7:43:20 PM PDT by gogipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

If you need evidence Lyndie England is a criminal perhaps you need to watch television or read a newspaper once in a while. People like you disgrace the honorable men and women in uniform.


70 posted on 05/27/2004 1:09:29 AM PDT by newfarm4000n (Taxes for social security is theft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: newfarm4000n; Victoria Delsoul
Buzz off, jerk. Victoria Delsoul is on target as usual and you are just another troll disruptor.

We wait for convictions in America. Crawl back under your DU sewer grate.
71 posted on 05/27/2004 1:14:53 AM PDT by broadsword (Liberalism is the societal AIDS virus that helps Islam to wage war against human civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

The women involved should claim that they got p.. uh peeved about the way that the male prisoners regarded them and the conditions of the women in the country, as well as the reports of the official Saddam-era torture and abuse of women in the prison. And so they reacted. They broke the law, but their actions were understandable in light of the hate the men showed for women and targeted at the worst fears of the enemy.


72 posted on 05/27/2004 1:27:00 AM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newfarm4000n
If you need evidence Lyndie England is a criminal perhaps you need to watch television or read a newspaper once in a while. People like you disgrace the honorable men and women in uniform.

LOL, you gotta stop watching too much TV and start thinking for yourself. Only those in the military can disgrace the military. As a civilian, my actions are extrinsic to the military.

73 posted on 05/27/2004 6:02:51 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul (The BushAdm has apologized for abuse of suspected terrorists-Has the Arab world apologized for 9/11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: broadsword

It took him 11 days to write a reply. ;-)


74 posted on 05/27/2004 6:03:43 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul (The BushAdm has apologized for abuse of suspected terrorists-Has the Arab world apologized for 9/11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
When all is said and done with this story, I belive the root of this evil will fall at the feet of one pathological, redneck prison guard.

DING DING DING

No more calls, we have a winner...

75 posted on 05/27/2004 6:06:39 PM PDT by Poohbah (Four thousand throats may be cut in a single night by a running man -- Kahless the Unforgettable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

Well, these people must have taken some initiative because I don't think anyone up the chain of command would have ordered them to have sex with each other in front of the the prisoners and a camera, at the very least.


76 posted on 05/27/2004 6:06:55 PM PDT by AmishDude (This tagline says it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
done>>>

To the Editor:

Why does the mainstream media continue to bash our troops and slant the news? They are fixated for 3 or 4 weeks now, on this so-called prisoner abuse “scandal”, where 6 or 8 soldiers abused (not tortured) Iraqi terrorists. So the terrorists were made to wear women’s panties on their heads and form a naked human pyramid. Big deal. Punish the abusers and move on. These prisoners are violent animals that were firing on, and killing American troops. They are not a bunch of harmless shoplifters.

Were they beheaded like American Nick Berg? Or shot, mutilated and strung from a bridge like the 4 American contractors? Does the liberal media show us these images over and over again? No. It’s selective reporting, and they never show us any of the good things happening there. How about showing us some of Saddam’s torture videos? They have the tapes. The liberal agenda is all about wearing down support for this war to hopefully bring down the President. The same thing happened during the Vietnam War.

Are things tough in Iraq? Sure, war is hell. Is it as bad over there as the media portrays? No. 90% of the country is secure and stable. Here is an actual quote from a soldier who just returned from Iraq: “I have been more scared of Iraq watching it from the news over here than I ever was over there -- and I was in quite a few little skirmishes, lots of firefights, about 75 hostile raids and I have never been so scared in my life watching it over here on this news. It's not near as bad as people think it is.” – Jeff- Moorhead, Oklahoma.

Let’s admit it. We’re at war with radical Islamists. We’re fighting this war over there because we do not wish to fight it here, in St. Louis or Los Angeles. Al-Queda is in Iraq now. They were there before the war. Saddam is an evil sadistic murderer who financed Palestinian suicide bombers. WMD, in the form of Sarin gas was just found. 25 million people have been liberated from tyrannical oppression. These are all facts, which liberals cannot dispute. Iraq is a central part of the war on terror, and Saddam had to be dealt with at some point. We are there to plant the seeds of democracy in the violence-plagued Middle East.

I guess the liberal mentality is, that war is ok as long as there is a Democrat in the White House.

77 posted on 05/27/2004 6:12:21 PM PDT by petercooper (Islam is not a religion of peace. It's a sadistic death cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: newfarm4000n; Victoria Delsoul

I beg to differ... I was in uniform until *very* recently, and I guarantee Victoria DelSoul was and is *far* from a disgrace.

Matter of fact, I think the word "disgrace" only applies to one person here. It ain't me, and it ain't her....


78 posted on 05/27/2004 6:16:50 PM PDT by Terabitten (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of All Who Threaten It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Tragically Single

Thank you, TS.


79 posted on 05/27/2004 6:19:33 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul (The BushAdm has apologized for abuse of suspected terrorists-Has the Arab world apologized for 9/11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Tragically Single

I'm not going to be getting into a childish slanging match. May i suggest you find a hobby


80 posted on 05/30/2004 6:03:50 PM PDT by newfarm4000n (Taxes for social security is theft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson