[Alas Babylon!]

In a time of war, a war where an enemy seeks out and targets civilians, killing indiscriminately for fanatical religious reasons, an enemy that wears no uniform nor belongs to no nation's military, what do the liberals expect should be the correct treatment of these enemeis when captured? Do they realize those captured may have information about future attacks, attacks targeting innocents?

I mean, of all the issues confronting us, can't they see we're dealing with criminals and thugs, not enemy soldiers?

This is all and only about "getting" Bush. If a democrat president employed these tactics, these same critics would have nothing but praise for it. They'd use my reasoning above. Getting an abortion, marrying their same-sex partners, and demonizing Republicans are far more important causes then preventing murder from terrorsits.

[evad]

I mean, of all the issues confronting us, can't they see we're dealing with criminals and thugs, not enemy soldiers?

This is all and only about "getting" Bush.

Zakly..
The "get Bush crowd" will fabricate anything to chip away at this man's credibility.

They haven't been successful yet...
and they won't be with this crapola either.

[mathluv]

'Getting an abortion, marrying their same-sex partners, and demonizing Republicans are far more important causes then preventing murder from terrorsits'

So sad.......so true!!!

[hocndoc]

You'd think the pro-abortion, pro-same-sex-marriage crowd would be howling at the oft-expressed view point of the Islamic men that the worst torture is to be made to feel like a woman, to be treated as they treat their women.

Tell me, which weapon should the US Forces use? Guns and bombs or what the enemy fears most: a pair of women's panties?