Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: prairiebreeze

First of all - I prefer diatribes to rants.
Second - what I posted and the thread I posted it on was entirely 'appropriate'.
Third - would you criticize the founding fathers about their 'negativism' when they were challenging the existing state - King George and the British crown.
Fourth - you didn't 'ask' about my sign up date - you arrogantly inferred that my joining was suspect.
Fifth - profanity is one thing - I'm not the only one who uses common street language on this site.
And lastly - I'm as cool as a cucumber, baby.


122 posted on 05/16/2004 3:50:18 PM PDT by Luker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: Luker

Well good for you. Luckily I can be on the alert to avoid reading future over-done, Bush-bashing "diatribes" that go against the rules of the website.

You come off as awfully defensive for somebody who is legitimate on FR. Toots.

Prairie


124 posted on 05/16/2004 3:58:43 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (So Hillary, how DID you know about the descriptions of the abuse before Rumsfeld did? Hmmmmmmmmm??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson