Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

You are correct. The top flange of the girder should have been laterally braced at several points. The flange apparently was not braced ar all allowing the girder to
twist at midspan, a common mode of failure.






41 posted on 05/15/2004 5:20:48 PM PDT by tommix2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: tommix2
So the girder is meant to support its load while in the vertical orientation. But if it's upper flange is not braced against lateral movement, it can twist on its longitudinal axis and then sag (while still supported at its ends). This indeed seems to be what happened. Thanks for your insight.

Lack of supervision at the site?

42 posted on 05/15/2004 6:25:03 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Any day you wake up is a good day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: tommix2
I don't think it twisted. The beam still seems to be on the abutments. It fell over, then sagged because it can't support its own weight in that orientation.

Something happened with the bracing (diaphragms) on the ends to allow it to fall over. If I was the superintendent on that job, I'd be thinking up a good excuse.
43 posted on 05/15/2004 6:49:20 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson