In a large sense, it shows you that liberal control of the government is to be feared. If they can't be decent and civil in something as simple as a debate, what would they do if they had the power of a gun to your head? That's ultimately what the government has, the power of a gun to your head. If you don't comply, the authorities will come after you to take you before a court. Fail to comply and they are authorized to use force, force up to deadly force if you resist and they have to use deadly force.
Here they wouldn't even let her talk. They had the power to do that because Al wanted to interupt, could interupt and they let a crowd be uncivil. They did that because they could. Do you think that they wopuln't put people in jail for opposing views if they could?
In a large sense, it shows you that liberal control of the government is to be feared. If they can't be decent and civil in something as simple as a debate, what would they do if they had the power of a gun to your head? That's ultimately what the government has, the power of a gun to your head. If you don't comply, the authorities will come after you to take you before a court. Fail to comply and they are authorized to use force, force up to deadly force if you resist and they have to use deadly force.
Here they wouldn't even let her talk. They had the power to do that because Al wanted to interupt, could interupt and they let a crowd be uncivil. They did that because they could. Do you think that they wopuln't put people in jail for opposing views if they could?