Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Certainly a spirited debate, but not as good as I hoped, and for the reasons I will post below.

...

...

I arrived at the Bushnell and met Nutmeg and her handsome Husband Zelig, and we entered on time. Unfortunately, I could not bring in the video camera, so I will have to rely on memory for this one: it was just too dark to take notes!

The format was a question and answer and response discussion, with Steve Roberts the moderator; Cokie Roberts' husband.

It startd off with a question to Ann on what she would least lke to talk about or reveal about herself.

She deflected the question to Al, and he went into some slow, deep discussion that led to some talk about his mom who recently passed away, Paul Wellstone and the funeral, and whatever came to his mind!

It was some sort of a self confession of sorts, he droned on, I remarked it was like a 12 step meeting.

As the debate moved on, one tactic Franken used a lot was to interrupt Ann often. Also, the crowd was quite negative against Ann in the orchestra seats, while the 3 of us Freepers in the balcony were quite defending of Annie!

In general, because I didn't write it down much, I saw how the cameras that showed each speaker when they spoke, favored Franken completely.

When Franken spoke, the camera was always on him, but when Ann spoke, it flashed to Franken often while she spoke, and then the crowd would react to his facial expressions and shout down Ann's answers.

Franken did make some intelligent points in his speech, but they were the repetitions of the typical liberal speech. I wished I could have given Ann some points on some things like Franken repeating the lie that this war was won on Clinton's War machjine, but, I was in the balcony, not the front row.

Franken contradicted himself a few times, quite obviously, in that he said more troops should have been used to fight the Iraq war, yet he was against the war itself.

Due to the abuse the lower seats gave Ann, I have o give the debate to Frranken, though, not because he earned it, he did do well, but he did not earn it, Ann lost it to the crowd which came in against her heavily. She stood her ground mightily, but the use of the camera showing Franken's face when she spoke, the crowd shouting her down when she tried to give details to her answers, Franken quoting single sentences from her book that the crowd would not let her explain in detail with any respect, that is what lost it for her, not her answers or efforts.

Franken was funny at times, I have to admit, and he warmed up to the audience quite well.

Ann was in hostile territory all night, though, and not allowed to fight her fight. Franken cut her off many times, the camera mocking her, the hostile crowd...

1 posted on 05/14/2004 9:36:16 PM PDT by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: RaceBannon

Who sponsored this Franken monologue...er...debate?


114 posted on 05/15/2004 8:35:16 PM PDT by Tabi Katz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RaceBannon

Not much difference between this "debate" and a Stalinist show trial.


120 posted on 05/16/2004 8:52:25 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (How can they call it a "Peace March" when they unconditionally support those who kill our soldiers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RaceBannon
Franken cut her off many times, the camera mocking her, the hostile crowd...</i

In a large sense, it shows you that liberal control of the government is to be feared. If they can't be decent and civil in something as simple as a debate, what would they do if they had the power of a gun to your head? That's ultimately what the government has, the power of a gun to your head. If you don't comply, the authorities will come after you to take you before a court. Fail to comply and they are authorized to use force, force up to deadly force if you resist and they have to use deadly force.

Here they wouldn't even let her talk. They had the power to do that because Al wanted to interupt, could interupt and they let a crowd be uncivil. They did that because they could. Do you think that they wopuln't put people in jail for opposing views if they could?

122 posted on 05/16/2004 8:58:06 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (How can they call it a "Peace March" when they unconditionally support those who kill our soldiers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RaceBannon

My daughter (who's 8) knows how much I like Ann Coulter and she was watching her one day with me and commented on how smart she was. I told her, yes, she was super smart and that she could grow up and be just like her if she studied hard in school. She looked at me and said, "You mean I can be a really smart Barbie too?"

LOL, I hope she does grow up to be a really smart Barbie.


153 posted on 05/17/2004 6:40:20 AM PDT by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson