Skip to comments.
CHOPPING HEADS
New York Post ^
| May 14, 2004
| AMIR TAHERI
Posted on 05/14/2004 6:46:40 PM PDT by sarcasm
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:21:50 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
May 14, 2004 -- THE murder of Nick Berg, a 26-year-old American businessman, by a group of Islamist terrorists in Iraq continues to send shock waves through much of the West. What has impressed most people is the fact that the terrorists cut Mr. Berg's head in the way that sheep are beheaded at the annual Feast of the Sacrifice.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amirtaheri; decapitation; mrtaheri; muslims; nickberg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
1
posted on
05/14/2004 6:46:40 PM PDT
by
sarcasm
To: sarcasm
I'm convinced that mohammed was the anti-christ. No 'religous' leader can possibly be as vile and violent and leave such a legacy of destruction and hell on Earth like he did.
2
posted on
05/14/2004 6:50:00 PM PDT
by
Monty22
To: sarcasm
I can't help but think it's going to have to happen here before the herd gets spooked.
3
posted on
05/14/2004 6:56:38 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(John Kerry, the Eddie Haskell candidate.)
To: cripplecreek
These cockroaches seem to dig deeper and go lower to get closer to their one true god, which Christians call the devil. Who else could they be worshiping when they cutoff an innocent's head, sleep in caves, hide in mosques, smell like a goat, treat women like dirt and offer praise to their special one, that dude down there.
To: sarcasm
Murder, oathbreaking, slave-taking, rape, head-chopping, and the rest of these customary Muslim atrocities go back all the way to the Prophet Muhammed. They are not perversions of Islam. They are normal to Islam.
Sometimes Muslims get a bit lazy and they neglect their slave-taking an headchopping. But not usually for very long.
5
posted on
05/14/2004 7:08:46 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: sarcasm
Ahhhh Islam, the religion of Peaces
6
posted on
05/14/2004 7:10:26 PM PDT
by
mylife
(The roar of the masses could be farts)
To: oneoftheothers
I didn't see the video, but I heard the audio of the murder. What an awful contrast between Burg's screams and shouts of 'allah akbar' trying to drown him out. The ancient pagans used to have lots of loud singing and music to drown the screams of the infants as they sacrificed them to Molech's fires. Makes me think allah an Molech are one and the same.
7
posted on
05/14/2004 7:14:50 PM PDT
by
tbpiper
To: sarcasm
Well, to be fair...the British and French harvested their share of heads along the way. Remember William Wallace? Rmember the French Revolution?
8
posted on
05/14/2004 7:15:09 PM PDT
by
The Duke
To: The Duke
That might be a fair comparison, if it weren't hundreds of years ago instead of last week.
9
posted on
05/14/2004 7:17:48 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(John Kerry, the Eddie Haskell candidate.)
To: sarcasm
I am happy to announce that as a Christian, I have no favorite method of execution, be it beheading as one does a sheep or otherwise.
Islam is not a religion, it is an excuse for violence.
Name one muslim leader who has spoken out against this atrocity.
10
posted on
05/14/2004 7:18:44 PM PDT
by
giznort
To: sarcasm
One Algerian specialist in slitting throats and cutting off heads was known as Momo le Nain (Muhammad the Midget). He was a 20-plus-year-old butcher's apprentice recruited by the GIA for the purpose of cutting off people's heads. In 1996 in Ben-Talha, a suburb of the capital Algiers, Momo cut off a record 86 heads in one night, including the heads of more than a dozen children.
and this collection of weirdos and misfits is a peacefull religion
11
posted on
05/14/2004 7:20:36 PM PDT
by
Charlespg
(Civilization and freedom are only worthy of those who defend or support defending It)
To: mylife
Ishmael was called 'the crazy man of the desert'. I don't think any thing has changed in 5000 years.
12
posted on
05/14/2004 7:23:38 PM PDT
by
roylene
To: sarcasm
The Muslims whave been doing this kind of thing to the Russians in
Chechnya for a long time.
13
posted on
05/14/2004 7:24:31 PM PDT
by
isthisnickcool
(I'm isthisnickcool, and I approved this post!)
To: sarcasm
"What has impressed most people is the fact that the terrorists cut Mr. Berg's head in the way that sheep are beheaded"
Um, no. I can assure him, that particular fact escaped all our attentions and we could not care less. They killers were saying we have a right to kill too, as though killing is the bothersome bit. This writer seems to think it is the choice of anatomy lesson. Both cluelessly.
It is the unchivalrous murder of an unarmed man entirely in one's own power. Not killing, as may happen in battle. Not the manner, as may happen even by accident.
And we know perfectly well why they do it. It has nothing to do with messages or traditions, and everything to do with what makes their dicks get hard. Murder of the defenseless does.
We are not so naive as to think they do it for anything but their own pleasure. And we know what the maxim behind that pleasure is. We know the little sick trick of fallen nature that sparks it, the secession from the human race involved. "If only everyone else were dead, only my spawn would remain". We know this delusion.
And we know what to do about it. We see it, we kill.
14
posted on
05/14/2004 7:29:33 PM PDT
by
JasonC
To: sarcasm
KA-CHUNK!!!!
15
posted on
05/14/2004 7:31:19 PM PDT
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: The Duke
"Well, to be fair...the British and French harvested their share of heads along the way. Remember William Wallace? Rmember the French Revolution?"
Yes, but did they slowly hack and saw through their screaming victims' necks with relatively small, ineffective instruments the way our enemy does in his penchant for human sacrifice?
16
posted on
05/14/2004 7:31:59 PM PDT
by
familyop
(Essayons)
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: giznort
So, all this throat slitting and head chopping. It's just a wacky cultural difference. Like capri pants and disco.
18
posted on
05/14/2004 7:34:00 PM PDT
by
Hodapp
("O Judgment, thou art fled to brutish beasts, and men have lost their reason.")
To: Baynative
Gene's an awesome guy on this subject, that's for sure.
19
posted on
05/14/2004 7:35:28 PM PDT
by
Monty22
To: The Duke
The more I learn about the French Revolution, the more revolting it seems. Of course there were the riots: the Bastille and the parading of heads around on pikes. The Guillotine was adopted during the terror because it was thought to be more humane. Scientific rationality triumphant: no pain, "like a breath of air" according to its inventor.
William Wallace? I don't know what to think. I saw the movie but know little else. He was a guerrilla, and terror was an indispensable to him, I would think. Nor was it unfamiliar to people back then. Hell, considering quaint practices like flaying,burning and draw and quartering, it was merciful.
Head hunting was a "Celtic thang" and both instances might have been residue of iron age culture. Old habits are hard to break. The Celts thought the soul resided in the head, which shows a little more sophistication than some other cultures of the time. But I think the real reason for the practice was documentary--indisputable proof of the boast.
Taking heads is no longer necessary; we have the Polaroid insta-matic.
20
posted on
05/14/2004 7:38:25 PM PDT
by
tsomer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson