The idea that we wouldn't need an amendment to the Constitution is an attractive one, but considering that Lambda Legal has telegraphed its strategy in filings and in interviews with Evan Wolfson over the last dozen years, doesn't it seem to be to you a losing play, to meet the salient of Lambda's strategy with inaction?
Lots of homosexual duckspeakers are putting down the same line you articulate: no action required, no there are no implications for your home state, remain calm, do nothing. Given the company you're running with, pardon me if I regard your advice as bad, even toxic.
The company I'm keeping?
Go ahead...trust the Feds, they'll fix everything.
Believe it or not, yesterday on the news I heard a SSAD man say almost exactly thoses same words.