To: zencat
That's why we need a Constitutional ban on gay marriage. We should believe activist judges who disregard the Constitution would have any regard for a Constitutional Ammendment because?
In order for an Ammendment to be effective, some judges will have to be removed from the bench.
17 posted on
05/14/2004 4:58:19 PM PDT by
c-b 1
To: c-b 1
"We should believe activist judges who disregard the Constitution would have any regard for a Constitutional Ammendment because?"
Indeed . . .
To: c-b 1
"We should believe activist judges who disregard the Constitution would have any regard for a Constitutional Ammendment because?
In order for an Ammendment to be effective, some judges will have to be removed from the bench."
Possibly, but we can't just go finding things in the Constitution to fit our beliefs. That's the liberal way of doing things.
21 posted on
05/14/2004 5:01:50 PM PDT by
zencat
To: c-b 1
"...In order for an Ammendment to be effective, some judges will have to be removed from the bench."
Ditto. They will only start paying attention when their jobs are at stake.
-- Joe
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson