Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: texasflower
chances are better that they would be in that group

Pure speculation. I have given you one example (Hinckley) otherwise. Have you anything solid to rest your assumptions on?

The Secret Service will better protect the President if they aren't distracted by nutcases.

Either onlookers are considered a viable threat, or they are not. Once the decision has been made to allow onlookers to stay, all peaceful citizens must be allowed equal access regardless of their political views. Free speech and assembly, indeed our founding charter and our most core values demand it.

To deny an American his unalienable rights based solely on his political opinions is un-American and tyrannical. Our country was founded on civic duty and dissent. Want to call this a free country? Then walk the walk.

417 posted on 05/20/2004 12:54:55 PM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies ]


To: freeeee

I stand by my statements. I have better things to do than to try and make a case to you.

Grow up.


418 posted on 05/20/2004 12:58:52 PM PDT by texasflower (in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson