Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sandy

A federal judge heard the case, and the First Circuit is taking the appeal. I think the federal issue would be the conflict between the "full faith and credit" clause and the Defense of Marriage Act.


9 posted on 05/14/2004 6:10:47 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: maryz

I said no federal court will bother with it, "bother with it" meaning "take it seriously".


10 posted on 05/14/2004 6:26:29 AM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: maryz
I can't see any federal issue here yet.
When someone tries to get "full faith and credit" in another state for their gay 'marriage', there would be.


Logically of course it isn't the constitutionally guaranteed "republican form of government" when a state's constitution has no meaning, but court rulings are exempted from that clause- by the courts.

11 posted on 05/14/2004 6:56:18 AM PDT by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson