I had hoped for better things from Tauro. Yesterday I posted that he is not demonstrably insane. Perhaps just weary.
1 posted on
05/14/2004 12:04:40 AM PDT by
maryz
To: maryz
Can one say, "a massive Massachusetts exodus after the forthcoming massive Massachusetts influx"?
2 posted on
05/14/2004 12:15:46 AM PDT by
EGPWS
To: maryz
That court "has the authority to interpret, and reinterpret, if necessary, the term marriage as it appears in the Massachusetts Constitution," Tauro wrote. Wasn't it the Cheshire Cat in Alice in Wonderland who said that words meant what he said they meant -- no more, no less?
4 posted on
05/14/2004 12:23:33 AM PDT by
maryz
To: maryz
7 posted on
05/14/2004 1:54:45 AM PDT by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: maryz
No federal court is going to bother with this. It's a state matter.
8 posted on
05/14/2004 6:02:42 AM PDT by
Sandy
To: maryz
Remind me never to move to Massachusetts (already the land of John Kerry and Ted Kennedy)
12 posted on
05/14/2004 4:22:01 PM PDT by
markv840
To: maryz
Is it true that he used the tenth Amendment for this? If so I don’t think that’s a good use of the Tenth Amendment.
15 posted on
07/10/2010 8:48:18 PM PDT by
Hilda
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson