Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Microsoft's WTL Off to Open Source
internetnews ^ | 12 May 2004 | Ryan Naraine

Posted on 05/13/2004 8:36:56 AM PDT by ShadowAce

For the second time in as many months, Microsoft (Quote, Chart) has published source code for one of its projects on SourceForge, the world's largest open-source software development repository.

The software giant announced plans to release the Windows Template Library (WTL) project on SourceForge under an externally created open-source license. The idea is to encourage a larger pool of developers to tinker with the code and improve the bug-finding process.

The WTL is a lightweight windowing C++ (define) template library that allows the creation of simple Windows GUI interfaces on Windows applications. According to Jason Matusow, manager of the Microsoft's Shared Source Initiative, the library was posted to the MSDN network for several years and has been downloaded more than 90,000 times.

"There was a concern on MSDN that we were not committing enough resources to the development of the WTL. We are addressing those concerns by releasing the source code to a wider developer community to allow them to work directly on the library," Matusow told internetnews.com.

"The whole function of shared source is to learn from open-source and apply that to how we do business."

The release of the WTL code mirrors last month's unprecedented release of the Windows Installer XML (WiX) toolset and all of its source code to developers on SourceForge.

While WTL code has been available on MSDN for many years, the WiX toolset was previously only used internally by Microsoft developers, a significant difference that Matusow hopes will provide a valuable lesson for future code releases on SourceForge.

He said the goals of the shared source initiative are to support existing customers, encourage new development, push academic research and provide business opportunities for Microsoft partners. As for whether developers might see more Microsoft code on SourceForge in the future, the hints are clear.

"We will we continue to go down this [SourceForge] path," Matusow said, making it clear it was a strategy decision embraced at all levels at Redmond. "It's not about whether it's right or wrong to release source code. It's about what's good for our customers and how it fits into our business."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Technical
KEYWORDS: microsoft; opensource
The idea is to encourage a larger pool of developers to tinker with the code and improve the bug-finding process.

Hmmm. Seems like maybe even MS is jumping onto the "Many eyes improves quality" bandwagon.

1 posted on 05/13/2004 8:36:57 AM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Bush2000; Golden Eagle; Salo; HiTech RedNeck
Tech Ping
2 posted on 05/13/2004 8:38:08 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Hardly. "The whole function of shared source is to learn from open-source and apply that to how we do business."

It's like the Borg learning about the Enterprise. They have no desire to emulate the Federation, merely to assimilate it.
3 posted on 05/13/2004 8:41:28 AM PDT by thoughtomator (This comment was wise, witty, interesting, and insightful... right up until the moment I hit "Post")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
even MS is jumping onto the "Many eyes improves quality" bandwagon.

Beware.
MS has never done anything without an eye toward their own bottom line.
There's some sort of "embrace and extend" work going on here.

4 posted on 05/13/2004 8:42:21 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
There's some sort of "embrace and extend" work going on here.

Yeah, I can see that--especially after the "under an externally created open-source license." clause in the article.

I wonder what that license's terms are, anyhow?

5 posted on 05/13/2004 8:45:35 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Imagine that, a company looking out for their bottom line. The nerve!!!
6 posted on 05/13/2004 8:55:31 AM PDT by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Absolutely... they are seeking free programming help.
7 posted on 05/13/2004 8:59:04 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (John F-ing Kerry??? NO... F-ING... WAY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Imagine that, a company looking out for their bottom line.

Not a thing wrong with it.
My point is they do nothing UNLESS it favors their bottom line.
Anyone thinking this is for the good of the community is overly optimistic.

8 posted on 05/13/2004 10:12:41 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Don't they know: Open Source is *communism*
9 posted on 05/13/2004 10:20:16 AM PDT by Salo (Revenge is for those too weak to hold a grudge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
I wonder what that license's terms are, anyhow?

Common Public License.

WiX and WTL are both licensed under the CPL.

10 posted on 05/13/2004 3:25:50 PM PDT by TechJunkYard (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Beware. MS has never done anything without an eye toward their own bottom line.

Duh. It's a corporation, not a freakin' charity.
11 posted on 05/14/2004 8:33:47 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Duh. It's a corporation, not a freakin' charity.

Like I said - nothing wrong with that.
But open source is viewed as a charity - everybody's in it for the group;.
MS ain't in it for that.

12 posted on 05/15/2004 4:31:00 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson