To: kattracks
Is it the London Daily Mirror saying these pictures or the ones of British prisoners are fake. Honestly, all of this does sound like something out of one of these multi porn sex act sites.
Brad
To: bradactor
Brad, there are photos of British soldiers that very much appear to be fake.
Those are the ones that show a prisoner being urinated on, a rifle butt to the groin of a prisoner and things like that. They include shots of a rifle that was not used in Iraq and a truck that was not sent there either.
There may have been some sex shots, but those are the ones I know about.
Now, the other pictures that are fake are the pictures that supposedly are American soldiers that are raping an Iraqi woman, forcing a woman to give oral sex to a soldier while other soldiers look on with their pants down, etc.
Those pictures came from a porn site. (Sex in War, or something like that is the name of it.)
Anyway, those pictures are not real. In fact, I saw them and they don't even look close to being real in my opinion.
I hope that helps. :)
91 posted on
05/13/2004 3:09:09 AM PDT by
texasflower
(in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
To: bradactor
The pictures are real in Abu Graib but even they were 'staged': Like the infamous one of the Iraqi prisoner with wires on a box.
There was no real torture, no real electricity. Just a pose that an idiot service-*woman* made a (perhaps frightened) prisoner do.
Why? to use to show other prisoners to threaten them 'talk or we do this'?
For FUN? To make something "artistic"?
A mole trying to make a pic useful for the 'anti-war' crowd? (and oh how they love it).
NO Real convincing explanation has come out of this as to why these pictures were TAKEN.
293 posted on
05/13/2004 9:51:30 AM PDT by
WOSG
(http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - I salute our brave fallen.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson