1 posted on
05/12/2004 7:24:16 PM PDT by
Pikamax
To: Pikamax
So let me see. A film about the life of Christ is criticized by a bunch of atheists for not conforming to their desired view of him.
OTOH, a film supposedly based on a scientific theory is nothing but BS, but that's ok because it is good liberal BS.
Oy vey.
I'm reminded of the greenie who said lying about global warming was ok because it was too important to let the plebs hear the truth. I guess this is just another element of their propaganda effort.
To: Pikamax; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
3 posted on
05/12/2004 7:39:38 PM PDT by
farmfriend
( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
To: Pikamax
That's odd. Every credible and knowledgable scientists I've seen interviewed for the movie have stated that the movie is pure BS in terms of science. The ones in this article clearly have an agenda.
To: Pikamax
Last night I was watching a PBS show about how the earths magnetic field is getting weaker and that could adversly effect our atmosphere. Could the Ozone hole be part of this entirely non-manmade problem? Any scientifically minded people have any idea's?
6 posted on
05/12/2004 8:34:50 PM PDT by
vpintheak
(Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
To: Pikamax
Dr King said was also justifiable poetic licence, pointing out that 21,000 people died in Europe last summer because of a heatwave linked to climate change. "There was little attribution to the cause, man-made climate change, and little public response, although it was a very extreme event." I was under the misunderstanding that it was the Frogs' poor planing and response, silly me.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson