Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elfman2
If Rumsfeld really accepted responsibility, it would include some statement like “I authorized them to…”, “I suggested that…” or at least, “I allowed…”. What he said was political BS.

How can he say this if it isn't true? For what reason would a man of Rummy's integrity fess up to something he didn't do? Doesn't make sense.

I don’t like how this war is being half fought, like Vietnam – leashing Marines from finishing their job. This is just the latest example.

Well, that one's certainly open for debate. If it's tactics you're talking about, I think your statement falls far short of being factual. If it's strategy, I personally would have none of this city fighting that I'm seeing every day.

118 posted on 05/12/2004 4:04:28 PM PDT by evad ("Such an enemy cannot be deterred, detained, appeased, or negotiated with. It can only be destroyed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: evad
"How can he say this if it isn't true? For what reason would a man of Rummy's integrity fess up to something he didn't do? Doesn't make sense."

Then he shouldn't "accept responsibility" for “something he didn’t do”. One should only accept responsibility for something he is “responsible” for. What a brain teaser that is…

". If it's tactics you're talking about, I think your statement falls far short of being factual. If it's strategy, I "

This is the story , factual. There’s absolutely NOTHING, Zero, Zip, Nada, to contradict it. I hope that you can be the first to find something to contradict the obvious. .

125 posted on 05/12/2004 5:58:43 PM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson