Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Warner: Photos Were to Intimidate Inmates
AP ^ | May 11, 2004

Posted on 05/11/2004 2:57:33 PM PDT by Leroy S. Mort

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Warner said that?
1 posted on 05/11/2004 2:57:35 PM PDT by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
It's way past time to dump the Senate branch of our Government - they are useless piles of dung weighing down our society with their communistic agendas and self-serving egos!
2 posted on 05/11/2004 3:05:19 PM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Let's swap Teddy Kennedy to the islamofasciasts!
3 posted on 05/11/2004 3:11:56 PM PDT by Highest Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
His comments contradict all of today's testimony. Our Congress is a ship of fools. Time for these "icon" Byrd, Warner, Specter, Kennedy, Harkin to retire and get some working brains in there.
4 posted on 05/11/2004 3:14:39 PM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
F the Red Cross! Where was their outrage for Saddam & his real torture chambers & rape rooms? I don't remember hearing them make any statements about that stuff.
5 posted on 05/11/2004 3:15:24 PM PDT by Feiny (This post ain't for everybody, just the sexy freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Uh... how is it useful to "embarrass them" if they all have their heads covered with hoods?

Seems Warner hasn't been paying attention.
6 posted on 05/11/2004 3:17:28 PM PDT by Ramius (Fly! You fools!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Uh... how is it useful to "embarrass them" if they all have their heads covered with hoods?

The guys with their faces in other guys' crotches were not wearing sandbags.

7 posted on 05/11/2004 3:21:55 PM PDT by 12B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
And why would the MIs not keep control over the pictures if they'd directed them. MI is notoriously and naturally interested in keeping control of information. Was there any set of files for them, either with MI, or with the MPs?
8 posted on 05/11/2004 3:26:29 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Taguba testified that tactical control of the Abu Ghraib facility had been taken away from Karpinski and turned over to a military intelligence colonel. Karpinski retained control over other Iraqi prisons in her command, and Taguba conceded that they remained largely free of abuse.
That suggests to me that the truly responsible party is somewhere below Karpinski's level. Were it her level, it would have been at other prisons under her command. Were it higher up, it would have been at those and even more.
9 posted on 05/11/2004 3:33:44 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert56
I clearly heard Taguba say today that this photos were taked with personal cameras by the implicated individuals. Where did he come up with this!
10 posted on 05/11/2004 3:33:47 PM PDT by AZamericonnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dales
I wanna find a transcript of today's hearing. I watched most of it and what the AP reports here is NOT what I heard.
11 posted on 05/11/2004 3:40:46 PM PDT by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
I watched most of it and what the AP reports here is NOT what I heard.

Spin, spin, spin.

12 posted on 05/11/2004 3:42:53 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
U.S. military personnel took photos of Iraqi prisoners in sexually humiliating poses in an apparent effort to obtain leverage for future interrogations, a leading senator said Tuesday.

WHY couldn't they have just showed 'em the piles of corpses left over from the firefights? If _I_ was a prisoner, that would'a 'leveraged' the hell outta ME: embarrassment is no where nearly as effective as a life-threat.

13 posted on 05/11/2004 3:44:45 PM PDT by solitas (sometimes I lay awake at night looking up at the stars wondering where the heck did the ceiling go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Uh... how is it useful to "embarrass them" if they all have their heads covered with hoods?

They were going to be shown to other prisoners to soften them up for interrogation. 'Talk to us or this is what's in store for you'.

14 posted on 05/11/2004 3:46:26 PM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dales
What you're saying is illogical. That group of 6 or 7 soldiers were at THAT prison, not at another prison. The case of England and her "lets do it together" boyfriend, (I think Graner) is a good example of people not acting alone but as a small group of folks "doing something stupid and not in anyones best interest". (It was wrong and self-serving).
15 posted on 05/11/2004 3:49:14 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: feinswinesuksass
The Red Cross goes in and talks to prisoners confidentially. Then, they rely on the word of these (mostly scumbags) who told them the USA made a mistake, yada yada, yada, but forgot to tell them things about themselves which might alter the resulting report.

In other words, they F**** LIE LIKE HELL.

16 posted on 05/11/2004 3:55:06 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
" ``Senators ... are in a virtual state of shock about the beheading,'' Warner said after returning to the committee hearing from the Senate floor."

WHY?

Dont they know the terrorists are capable of things like this?

17 posted on 05/11/2004 3:59:27 PM PDT by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - I salute our brave fallen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Uh, you are saying pretty much what I was saying but in a different way.

The left has been trying to say this was systematic and was policy.

If it was, it would have been elsewhere. And if it was condoned high up, it would have been elsewhere under whatever point the condoning existed.

18 posted on 05/11/2004 3:59:37 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
"" ``Senators ... are in a virtual state of shock about the beheading,..."

Why indeed.
As if they didn't know that publicizing this would result in all that it has... up to and including the savage and cruel beheading of our men like Berg.

Yes, we needed to get to the bottom of the nonsense going on at Abu Ghraib and stop it. But doing so did not require airing the dirty laundry to the world.

So I'd go so far as to say that those who chose to expose it have more blood on their hands than anyone who might have ordered some "humiliation" of prisoners under interrogation.
19 posted on 05/11/2004 4:27:20 PM PDT by Trinity_Tx (Most of our so-called reasoning consists in finding arguments for going on believin as we already do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
All things considered, what our guys did was child's play.
20 posted on 05/11/2004 4:29:56 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson