Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Orders Kansas' Public Schools Closed (Activist Judge Alert)
AP ^ | 05/11/04 | AP

Posted on 05/11/2004 12:19:36 PM PDT by ILBBACH

Judge Orders Kansas' Public Schools Closed

POSTED: 11:08 am CDT May 11, 2004 UPDATED: 12:48 pm CDT May 11, 2004

TOPEKA, Kan. -- The state must close its public schools this fall while it fixes constitutional flaws in its system for distributing aid to those schools, a district judge ruled Tuesday in a case that is already under appeal to the Kansas Supreme Court.

The order issued by Shawnee County District Judge Terry Bullock anticipates he will soon issue a follow up restraining order preventing the spending of any money after June 30. That means the Tuesday's order will not affect the current academic year.

Dan Biles, an attorney for the State Board of Education, said an appeal of Tuesday's order will be filed quickly, and could stay Bullock's order past the start of the new school year.

"This action by the court will terminate all spending functions under the unconstitutional funding provisions, effectively putting our school system on 'pause' until the unconstitutional funding defects are remedied by the legislative and executive branches of our government," Bullock wrote in Tuesday's order.

He continued: "Although this action may delay our children's education slightly (should the other branches fail to respond quickly), it will end the inadequate and inequitable education being provided now and the disparate damage presently being done to the most vulnerable of our children."

The order was quickly dismissed by Republican legislative leaders, who had already said they planned to pay it little heed, given that the case is already on appeal to the Supreme Court.

"It's ridiculous," said House Speaker Doug Mays, R-Topeka.

Whitney Watson, a spokesman for Attorney General Phill Kline, who filed the appeal to the state's highest court, said the office is reviewing the ruling and planned to announce a response at 2 p.m.

Bullock's decision came just three days after legislators adjourned the 2004 session without acting on his December order to fix state's school finance system, which he found to be unconstitutional.

Bullock issued that preliminary ruling in a 1999 lawsuit brought by parents and administrators in the Dodge City and Salina school districts. He concluded that state's system for distributing $2.77 billion in aid is unconstitutional partly because of how it distributes money to programs for poor and minority students.

He also found the existing level of funding to be constitutionally inadequate.

Bullock gave legislators the 2004 session to fix the system, setting a deadline of July 1 to make his order final. Legislators responded by passing a law allowing the state to immediately appeal the preliminary order to the Kansas Supreme Court.

Gov. Kathleen Sebelius said it was "truly unfortunate" that children, parents and teachers must pay the price of legislative inaction.

Alan Rupe, an attorney representing the Salina and Dodge City districts, said Bullock's order is "certainly called for by basis of the Legislature's behavior."

He said legislators were "defiant" in ignoring Bullock's earlier ruling and failing to find a school finance solution, and that Tuesday's ruling suggests appropriate consequences.

"You can't argue with the logic that if the school finance statutes are unconstitutional, you don't enforce them," Rupe said.

In his Tuesday ruling, Bullock said there were "literally hundreds" of ways legislators could structure, manage and fund public schools. He said that legislators could determine inefficiencies in the present structure and that those corrections might reduce the total dollars needed to fund education.

Those corrections, he wrote, could include consolidation of school districts and the outsourcing or regionalization of services.

During the trial, attorneys for the Salina and Dodge City school districts presented a 2002 consultants' study suggesting that schools were underfunded in Kansas by more than $800 million.

"At this point, nothing Judge Bullock did would come as a surprise," said John Koepke, executive director of the Kansas Association of School Boards. "Judge Bullock made clear in his preliminary order his frustration that the legislature has let things deteriorative to the point they are now. It's difficult to understand how closing schools would help children."

Parents of children from Wichita to Olathe starting calling schools almost as soon as Bullock's order was released, looking for more information.

"It has the potential to be the most disruptive circumstance I've encountered in public education in the last 40 years," said Olathe schools Superintendent Ron Wimmer. "I've never experienced a circumstance where a judge has ordered a complete shutdown of the schools."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: judicialtyrrany
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: bereanway
Similar Studies in Other States -- You Could Be Next
21 posted on 05/11/2004 1:04:05 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cavtrooper21; Vic3O3
Hey Cav!

I can only guess that this means your property taxes are going up yet again. When do y'all want to move down here? Not that the property taxes are any better here mind you.

Semper Fi
22 posted on 05/11/2004 1:04:10 PM PDT by dd5339 (Happiness is a full VM-II and a DEAD AND BURIED AWB!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bereanway
From the Kansas Study:

Additional Factors: The study analyzed transportation funding. The study did not consider facilities, food service, and "efficiency."

Public Input: Informal Conversations with "60 or so" people selected by the State Education Department and Legislative Committee

Prepared for: Legislative Coordinating Council, authorized by state statute

Prepared by: Augenblick & Myers, Inc.

23 posted on 05/11/2004 1:06:34 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dd5339
You're in Texas now?
24 posted on 05/11/2004 1:07:29 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: axel f
Ping to another thread on the same subject.
25 posted on 05/11/2004 1:08:27 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ILBBACH
The state should simply get out of the business of education. Abolish all public schools, except the university, and leave it up to local government to provide what schools they choose to fund.
26 posted on 05/11/2004 1:10:11 PM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
The "Campaign for Fiscal Equity" article you posted notes how rural Kansans will be concerned if the funding mandates are met by closing and consolidating school districts.

The authors of the article might like to know what will really concern rural Kansans is an increase in Kansas ag land property valuations and taxes. We in Kansas already pay 2-3 times the taxes on ag land when compared to comparable land in MO, OK and TX.

I believe the Kansas public school system is also very top heavy (bureaucrats) compared to surrounding states.
27 posted on 05/11/2004 1:10:12 PM PDT by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dufekin
"the judge has usurped the legislature's appropriation authority"...How true you are...Judges have been playing the public for dumb quite a bit lately... '02 Elections & Florida Supreme Court judges come to mind..
28 posted on 05/11/2004 1:11:25 PM PDT by jungleboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bereanway
I don't know, but I don't think they really care about what rural Kansans think.
29 posted on 05/11/2004 1:13:55 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ILBBACH
Impeach him, and more importantly, while the impeachment process is going forward, IGNORE him. If we're ever to take back our country from the judiciary, that's what must happen: IGNORE THEM.

MM
30 posted on 05/11/2004 1:15:53 PM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dd5339
Actually ag land taxes are a whole bunch better in TX than KS. Two years ago taxes on some grass land and oil production I have in KS went up by 36% in one year. I compared my land to TX and OK grass land (similar carrying capacity) and my land taxes were 2 and 3 times higher at that time.
31 posted on 05/11/2004 1:16:51 PM PDT by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GOPcapitalist
It's remarkable how much power a judge has, to shut down an entire school system. I agree, impeach him. Judicial impeachments seem to be the only effective "check and balance" left.
32 posted on 05/11/2004 1:18:05 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Here's the Capital-Journal's take on this.

This quote from Bullock is really scary.

Some of the plans proposed would have increased what school districts can raise through local property taxes, or their local option budgets. Bullock said local option budgets aren't constitutional and "by their nature are more available to wealthy districts both politically and in the revenues generated."

Pure socialism.

Here is a somewhat encouraging statement from the King, though.

Bullock suggested the Legislature take up a so-called "school-based budgeting" provision, which requires school districts to submit proposals to the Legislature for what it costs to educate children in their districts. Under the current system, the Legislature determines the cost of educating children and then appropriates funds.

The problem is, school administrators fight this tooth and nail. Sen. Bill Bunten has been working to get this implemented, and the school administrators and a few left-wing legislators won't allow it. They don't want people to know how the money is being spent in their districts.

33 posted on 05/11/2004 1:21:13 PM PDT by axel f
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
You're right. They couldn't care less about what rural Kansans think. The just want to give the appearance that rural Kansans want more money spent on education.

I like the part about the input for the study being from "60 or so" Kansans selected by the educrats. Probably all worked for the Dept of Education.
34 posted on 05/11/2004 1:22:03 PM PDT by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: aardvark1
We had a town vote to "secede" from the state this year and join NH.

That's an interesting concept. I wonder if it would be legal for two states to vote to become one state, such as New Hampshire and Vermont becoming New Vermont or whatever name they would choose.

35 posted on 05/11/2004 1:35:41 PM PDT by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: axel f
Wanna bet the media doesn't go ballistic over Sebelius' reference to God? Providing all Kansas children with educational opportunities that allow them to reach their God-given potential is our most important responsibility."

Anyway, it looks like Bullock needs to get out of the judge business and run for office. But then again, why bother when it's trendy and more powerful to legislate from the bench.

36 posted on 05/11/2004 1:46:15 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Why bother running for office when you can get appointed by a friend without voter approval to a position where you can force your will on others?

Somemore information from the CJ article.

Alan Rupe, an attorney representing the Salina and Dodge City school districts, said the decision marked a "great day for Kansas kids."

Here are some of Rupe's financial contributions, according to opensecrets.org

$250 Carlos Nolla $300 Randy Rathbun $200 John Carlin

37 posted on 05/11/2004 2:07:28 PM PDT by axel f
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: axel f
That says a lot.
38 posted on 05/11/2004 2:09:06 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: axel f
btw, that opensecrets site is pretty cool.
39 posted on 05/11/2004 2:35:30 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dd5339; cavtrooper21
as if we needed another reason to move to TX and to homeschool!
40 posted on 05/11/2004 2:40:10 PM PDT by Vic3O3 (Jeremiah 31:16-17 (KJV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson