Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: apokatastasis

It's like the Czech intel about Atta, the plane used for terrorist training, Abu Abbas and Abu Nidal in Bagdad, the Kay report acknowledging a far greater terrorist presence in Iraq than anyone ever thought, etc.

How much evidence is enough? VX gas in Jordan as an AQ plot to kill tens of thousands, VX probably from Iraq, the accepted 200 tons of yellow cake Saddam aquired prior to the Wilson fake yellow cake trip (he's got a company dealing in gold from Niger).

As for being released on the eve of Saddams capture, did we know we were going to find him in that hole? From all accounts actually finding him was a fluke.

DK


72 posted on 05/16/2004 2:51:30 PM PDT by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Dark Knight
I think Iraq was behind 9/11. But I also think that memo's too good to be true. Maybe I'm wrong about that. Maybe I should take Ayad Allawi at his word when he says it's "the most compelling piece of evidence that we have found so far". I will reserve judgment until I have more to go on.

True or false, I don't think the story's timing can possibly be coincidental. It appears to have come out on the very day of Saddam's capture. And finding him was not a fluke, it was the result of hard work. The Abu Ghraib interrogations might even be what cracked the case - apparently most of them happened between October and December 2003.

If it really was VX in Jordan, that's interesting, because it was also supposed to be VX at the Sudanese "aspirin factory" which Clinton bombed in 1998.

73 posted on 05/17/2004 2:08:26 AM PDT by apokatastasis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson