Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Esteemed Journalist Lectures On Ethics (LA Times Editor!)
Oregon Daily Emerald | May 10, 2004 | Ayisha Yahya

Posted on 05/10/2004 10:49:12 AM PDT by whereasandsoforth

Esteemed journalist lectures on ethics

Los Angeles Times Editor John S. Carroll delivers the annual Ruhl Lecture as part of 'Ethics Week' on Thursday By Ayisha Yahya News Editor May 07, 2004

The media industry has been infested by the rise of pseudo-journalists who go against journalism's long tradition to serve the public with accurate information, Los Angeles Times Editor John S. Carroll told a packed room in the Gerlinger Lounge on Thursday.

Carroll delivered the annual Ruhl Lecture, titled "The Wolf in Reporter's Clothing: The Rise of Pseudo-Journalism in America." The lecture was sponsored by the School of Journalism and Communication.

"All over the country there are offices that look like newsrooms and there are people in those offices that look for all the world just like journalists, but they are not practicing journalism," he said. "They regard the audience with a cold cynicism. They are practicing something I call a pseudo-journalism, and they view their audience as something to be manipulated."

In a scathing critique of Fox News and some talk show hosts, such as Bill O'Reilly, Carroll said they were a "different breed of journalists" who misled their audience while claiming to inform them. He said they did not fit into the long legacy of journalists who got their facts right and respected and cared for their audiences.

Carroll cited a study released last year that showed Americans had three main misconceptions about Iraq: That weapons of mass destruction had been found, a connection between al-Qaeda and Iraq had been demonstrated and that the world approved of U.S intervention in Iraq. He said 80 percent of people who primarily got their news from Fox believed at least one of the misconceptions. He said the figure was more than 57 percentage points higher than people who get their news from public news broadcasting.

"How in the world could Fox have left its listeners so deeply in the dark?" Carroll asked.

He added that a difference exists between journalism and propaganda.

As he addressed some of the hard hits journalism has taken in the field of ethics, Carroll noted that anyone could be a journalist because, unlike other fields, journalism had no qualification tests, boards to censure misconduct or a universally accepted set of standards.

However, Carroll said a great depth of feeling remains on the importance of ethics that is centered around newspapers' sense of responsibilities to their readers.

"I've learned that these ethics are deeply believed in even though in some places they are not even written down," he said. When ethical guidelines are ignored, their proponents respond with 'tribal ferocity,'" he added.

"If you stray badly from these rules, you will pay dearly," he said.

He said while much media has ended up "in the gutter," the L.A. Times has a different philosophy and was dedicated to taking the "high road."

"I do think that a lot of newspaper people have made a lot of strategic mistakes," he said. "They cut back space on things people really need to know."

Carroll, whose career as a journalist spans 40 years, joined the L.A. Times in 2000, according to the paper's Web site. Under his leadership, the paper earned five Pulitzer Prizes this year.

Tim Gleason, dean of the SOJC, said Carroll is a "journalist's journalist."

"As an editor he cares deeply about the integrity of the profession and he believes that news, real news is the heart and soul of the business of journalism," Gleason said as he introduced Carroll.

University graduate student Mose Mosely had similar sentiments. He said he admired Carroll not only for his vast experience around the country, but also for his consistent commitment to his ideals.

"The depth of his integrity is very impressive," Mosely said.

Bobbie Willis, a staff writer for the Eugene Weekly, said she felt Carroll brought up some relevant issues in today's media environment.

"It really made me take a look at my career as a journalist," she said.

Willis said she understood Carroll's concerns about the state of journalism nationally, but added that many of the journalists she has encountered were very committed to accurate and ethical reporting.

Carroll had a few words of advise for student journalists; he told them to pick their boss carefully.

"Don't be lured by the money or the big name of the employer," he said, adding that journalists should not allow their integrity to be compromised by unscrupulous employers.

"Don't be a piano player in a whorehouse," he said.

Contact the news editor at ayishayahya@dailyemerald.com.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: journalism; latimes; mediabias; myth; pseudojournalism

1 posted on 05/10/2004 10:49:13 AM PDT by whereasandsoforth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth
Irony abounds!
2 posted on 05/10/2004 10:49:49 AM PDT by whereasandsoforth (tagged for migratory purposes only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth
John S. Carroll giving an ethics lesson is like Al Capone lecturing on honesty.
Carroll has about as much credibility as a screen door on a submarine.
3 posted on 05/10/2004 10:53:44 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth
Isn't this kind of like the pot labeling the snow as black...
4 posted on 05/10/2004 11:02:43 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth
I had to double check. I thought this was from "the Onion" or Broken Newz.
5 posted on 05/10/2004 11:06:09 AM PDT by thecanuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth
Los Angeles Times Editor John S. Carroll's lecture on Pseudo-Journalism in America was hypocrisy at the highest level.
The Times rag has been a bastion of left-wing poison since the 60's and Vietnam War. As California rolled into deeper liberalism, so did the Times writers. Good example was the recent California recall election, where the Times couldn't get their readers to believe skewed journalistic trash. They then resorted to even more false reporting, which led to thousands of subscribers to cancel. Arnold won, but the Times did not apologize, or recant any articles! Carroll's claim to his paper being on journalisms high road, is a hoot!
6 posted on 05/10/2004 11:18:39 AM PDT by Smartass ( BUSH & CHENEY IN 2004 - THE BEST GET BETTER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth
How odd that none of Carroll's well documented acts of bias (e.g., the Schwarzenegger attacks) at the LA Times were worth mentioning. Only that mean old Roger Ailes made the grade, and some idiotic "study" (never named thereby uncheckable) that says Americans (the dumb conservative ones at least) think the world loves us.

Yeah right, everybody at FR thinks the world loves us.

What a JOKE the left is today. It's just absurd. Their decades long run of lies has run out, though, and it seems they really have no idea how silly they sound to those of us who have figured out the game they play.

7 posted on 05/10/2004 11:39:18 AM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth
Where did this oxy-moronic pig come from, the "Animal Farm"?
8 posted on 05/10/2004 1:18:19 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth
Yesterday I was showing my daughter the pathetic journalism in the SF Chronicle. (She's an editor of an entertainment magazine, no politics there.) The SF Chronicle had a picture of a minaret with a small hole blown in it, with a caption that "U.S. forces had destroyed the minaret.". A couple days before, they were saying that U.S. forces had destroyed the mosque during a firefight with Iraqi rebels. With a picture showing evidence to the contrary, they still lie, saying we destroyed the minaret. But it looked intact with a small hole where we took out a sniper that was firing an rpg at our men. Journalists don't know the meaning of "damaged" versus "destroyed".
9 posted on 05/10/2004 2:05:42 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson