Skip to comments.
Blix subordinates on Saddam's payroll
Fox News ^
| May 9, 2004
| Self
Posted on 05/09/2004 9:06:54 AM PDT by SaudiDuck
Two of Blix's subordinates found to be on Saddam's payroll. Iraqi nuclear scientists sent to Libya prior to the war. Objective to create an Arab nuclear weapon.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blix; bush2004; corruption; iraq; libya; proliferation; saddam; un; uncorruption; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-194 next last
To: Jumper
"
Is it possible that the entire world/UN and even especially
the democrats are out to neuter the USA economically, politically and militarily? Seems a fix may be in:)"
Yes.
Probable odds? About 9,999,999,999 to 1
101
posted on
05/09/2004 11:14:58 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
(A President is best judged by the enemies he makes when he has really hit his stride…Max Lerner)
To: Family Guy
And .. you would be wrong!! It's the democRATS who play those kinds of games .. not President Bush.
The only reason the dems bring it up is because they are the ones who would do such things and they automatically think everyone is a "crooked lying bunch" like they ARE!
102
posted on
05/09/2004 11:16:29 AM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: bcoffey
"
Liz Trotta, I think."
Thanks b.
103
posted on
05/09/2004 11:17:47 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
(A President is best judged by the enemies he makes when he has really hit his stride…Max Lerner)
To: Moonman62
"
I don't. In a free society such information shouldn't be held back to be used as a political tool."
Though an admiral thought, this is a war.
You don't shoot the bullets as fast as they come off the manufacturing line.
104
posted on
05/09/2004 11:21:29 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
(A President is best judged by the enemies he makes when he has really hit his stride…Max Lerner)
To: BOBWADE; Mrs Zip
Golly, I'm soooo surprized. (NOT)
105
posted on
05/09/2004 11:23:48 AM PDT
by
zip
(Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough became truth to 42% of americans)
To: goodnesswins
.
...and they had heard NOTHING about it.....You mean they don't watch cspin at 3 in the morning???
106
posted on
05/09/2004 11:25:15 AM PDT
by
zip
(Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough became truth to 42% of americans)
107
posted on
05/09/2004 11:30:51 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(WHICH 17 members of congress were contacted by Lawson about the pictures, and did nothing?)
To: SaudiDuck
This is humongous news. Is this the October surprise 5 month's early?
To: Howlin
Thanks for the ping lady. This is definitely important news. Let's see if any of the other media outlets pick it up.
To: zip
First aired 5/4/04 at 8:40 PM EDT
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!
Rush is right. They are becoming more delusional by the week!
111
posted on
05/09/2004 11:36:35 AM PDT
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Any day you wake up is a good day.)
To: pookie18
.
...and they had heard NOTHING about it..... You mean they don't watch cspin at 3 in the morning???
"First aired 5/4 etc"
I'll 'splain it to you:
You mean they don't watch cspin at 3 in the morning? </sarcasm off)
112
posted on
05/09/2004 11:42:13 AM PDT
by
zip
(Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough became truth to 42% of americans)
Comment #113 Removed by Moderator
To: zip
....and they had heard NOTHING about it..... You mean they don't watch cspin at 3 in the morning??? "First aired 5/4 etc" I'll 'splain it to you: You mean they don't watch cspin at 3 in the morning? </sarcasm off) Oh, now I understand. They didn't watch C-SPAN at 8:40 PM, didn't see any other newcasts than covered it, didn't see any editorials about it & didn't see any newspaper articles about it. Thanks, now I understand ;-)</sarcastic grin off>
To: Howlin; SaudiDuck
OOOooooooooooo!!!! Verrrrry interesting!
But not a bit surprising.
The party's over............it's time to call it a day..........
115
posted on
05/09/2004 11:49:39 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
To: SaudiDuck
More evidence that shows that Libya may still have WMD.
116
posted on
05/09/2004 11:55:46 AM PDT
by
yonif
("So perish all Thine enemies, O the Lord" - Judges 5:31)
To: SaudiDuck; oldglory; Luke FReeman; MinuteGal; sheikdetailfeather; gonzo
You were watching Eric Shawn's "Inside Scoop" segment with John Loftus. I videotaped it.
117
posted on
05/09/2004 11:57:39 AM PDT
by
Matchett-PI
(Entrenched DemocRAT union-backed bureaucrats quietly sabotage President Bush every day.)
To: Moonman62
A lot of people have been hinting at this all along. I believe that this is being held back by the Bush administration until the best possible political use could be made of it. I think that might be maybe a month before election.
I don't. In a free society such information shouldn't be held back to be used as a political tool.
Was waiting to see how long this would go before this would be spun as Bush's fault, or his involvement, somehow.
Not only should information not be held back, it should not be wrongly and falsely manipulated
Get that...
Michael Moore
Air America
CNN
CBS
NBC
etc.
etc.
To: woodyinscc
President Bush could get two birds with one stone. If the facts are there, and he presents his case to the American people, the dims and the press will be helpless. Yes indeed.
With respect to the Iraqi nuclear scientists being shipped to Libya, I would have to think that this is a real smoking gun. Big Time. If Saddam had that many scientists working the problem and Qaddafi felt they were knowledgeable enough to help his program then clearly Iraq represented a great security risk to the U.S., the Middle East and the world. Also given the Pakistan-North Korea-Iran-Libya nuclear connection, the fact that Saddam would move his people to Libya shows that he was in the club as well.
For me, that is a good enough reason for invading Iraq. And furthermore, the bet paid off when Qaddafi folded his cards.
I wonder if the recent saber rattling by Gathafi could have something to do with this story leaking out. Could be that Qaddafi thought this part of the story would stay bottled up and when he found out it wasn't he needed some cover with his Middle East Brethren.
And...anyone who would ship his Nuclear Scientist Crew to Libya would surely consider dumping his chemical and biological weapons on Syria. Are you listening in Jordan? What do you hear?
To: sweetliberty
Aren't you forgetting how efficiently the RAT run media can amuputate the legs off of any story that doesn't serve their agenda?Who could forget, but the rat media has been made by much of the public who follow news. Even the democrats.
The recent polling about the huge support for Rumsfeld in the face of the massive attacks generated by the rat media shows that they do not have as much effect as anticipated.
120
posted on
05/09/2004 12:07:54 PM PDT
by
Cold Heat
(Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-194 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson