[I_saw_the_light]

So, is this the same LA Times that ran this image... as a "real" photo and got busted?

Here is the undoctored one...

Does anyone remember that? I am fairly sure it was the LA Times.

[I_saw_the_light]

Bingo...it was.

Link

[bootyist-monk]

I remember that image. What is so pathetic about the whole thing is that it's not even a good Photoshop. That's why they got busted in the first place.

For instance, look at the man crouched to the left of the soldier's feet. Now, look to the right of soldier. The back of the same man has just been copied and pasted. You can also see the same head of a different man seated just behind the crouching man on both sides of the soldier. The LA Times wanted to leave the impression that the soldier was threatening a man with a child. But of course, that doesn't fall under this moron's defintion of "manipulation".